Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Amplified\s+TV\s+Antenna\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Amplified\s+TV\s+Antenna\s*$/: 61 ]

Total 61 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [Amps] Amplified TV Antenna (score: 1): Author: W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 07:18:04 -0400; You got what you got. In most cases the antenna had to be adjusted for each channel. With DTV this is not very practical as the TV must scan the channels seen by the antenna at that instant. ________; /archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00085.html (9,886 bytes)
42. Re: [Amps] Amplified TV Antenna (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 08:53:27 -0400; Reception of DTV and NTSC is no different at the antenna. Channel scanning is channel scanning and using "cut to channel" Yagis is still "good engineering practice" in multi customer (cable, large ap; /archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00087.html (11,765 bytes)
43. Re: [Amps] Amplified TV Antenna (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 09:33:27 -0400; When I was living on LI in the late 40's to 59 stacked bowties and folded dipoles were common since the only direction was at NYC. The few who wanted blacked out sports used a directional antenna wit; /archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00088.html (13,967 bytes)
44. Re: [Amps] Amplified TV Antenna (score: 1): Author: "Jerry Kaidor" <jerry@tr2.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 08:19:53 -0700 (PDT); ** And from my original question. Is it a good bet to install this well-regarded amplified TV antenna? Bearing in mind that I will be helpless if the internal amp suffers fundamental overload at HF?; /archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00089.html (11,740 bytes)
45. Re: [Amps] Amplified TV Antenna (score: 1): Author: donroden@hiwaay.net; Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 09:44:45 -0500; It's much simpler to "fix" things on the ground. Don W4DNR _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps; /archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00090.html (9,336 bytes)
46. Re: [Amps] Amplified TV Antenna (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 12:03:17 -0400; Also far removed from amplifiers and their operation - more appropriate for a DTV antennas list. A twinlead folded dipole "FM Antenna" (88-108 MHz) is not very good on UHF TV (450-900 MHz). It has a; /archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00092.html (14,244 bytes)
47. Re: [Amps] Amplified TV Antenna (score: 1): Author: W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 13:43:54 -0400; Many people DO have problems with DTV and this includes a number of broadcast engineers. This is especially true for those who live in fringe areas that are served by stations arriving from different; /archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00095.html (15,546 bytes)
48. Re: [Amps] Amplified TV Antenna (score: 1): Author: W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 13:51:57 -0400; If you are really that nervous, stick to the bowtie and possibly a high pass filter. This said with the assumption that the stations you watch are more or less in the same direction. Use a 4 bay vert; /archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00096.html (12,771 bytes)
49. Re: [Amps] Amplified TV Antenna (score: 1): Author: W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 13:54:56 -0400; Most people report acceptable results on VHF with a UHF bowtie if the V is relatively local. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contest; /archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00097.html (15,401 bytes)
50. Re: [Amps] Amplified TV Antenna (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 14:44:45 -0400; If you are going to erect an external antenna, use the right antenna for the job. In mixed U/V environments, that's a U/V antenna - not a UHF bowtie that just "might" work on close-in VHF signals. If; /archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00099.html (17,292 bytes)
51. Re: [Amps] Amplified TV Antenna (score: 1): Author: W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 14:55:34 -0400; That is what the theory says. In practice if the signal is above the digital cliff it is 100%. What make life more complicated? Many people have height, space and covenant restrictions. They in pract; /archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00100.html (18,475 bytes)
52. Re: [Amps] Amplified TV Antenna (score: 1): Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 13:59:36 -0500; Bob put digital in single quotes like this: 'digital' the meaning was not that there is literally such a thing as a digital antenna in the technical sense but rather that some antennas do better than; /archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00101.html (10,134 bytes)
53. Re: [Amps] Amplified TV Antenna (score: 1): Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 14:13:50 -0500; ABC Chicago stuck with channel 7 virtual and real which turned out to be a big mistake. One problem was that there was another station on 7 in Grand Rapids MI. They are still on 7 but also they are o; /archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00102.html (11,383 bytes)
54. Re: [Amps] Amplified TV Antenna (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 12:20:42 -0700; So what? That doesn't change the engineering and economic basis for those decisions. Jim _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.; /archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00103.html (10,045 bytes)
55. Re: [Amps] Amplified TV Antenna (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 12:29:04 -0700; You are forgetting the 90 MHz of spectrum between the top of Ch 6 (88 MHz) and the bottom of Ch 7 (174 MHz). It IS, indeed, a continuous function, the impulse noise DOES decay gradually with increasi; /archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00104.html (9,749 bytes)
56. Re: [Amps] Amplified TV Antenna (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 16:07:27 -0400; The digital cliff is the perfect vehicle for sloppy design since it allows a system to show a generally perfect picture one moment and nothing the next. It simply hides sloppy system design. Working; /archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00105.html (21,044 bytes)
57. Re: [Amps] Amplified TV Antenna (score: 1): Author: W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 19:50:38 -0400; Yes it was. Nobody knew how that might play out and the budget was to finance a science project. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.con; /archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00111.html (10,265 bytes)
58. Re: [Amps] Amplified TV Antenna (score: 1): Author: W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 19:59:12 -0400; If it is not consumer friendly it is irrelevant. There is a huge information and technology gap these days between consumers and engineers. If OTA TV is to survive, the simple solutions are necessary; /archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00112.html (23,132 bytes)
59. Re: [Amps] Amplified TV Antenna (score: 1): Author: donroden@hiwaay.net; Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 19:04:21 -0500; Excellent Point !! You said it in fewer words than I was planning... LOL !! Don W4DNR _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com; /archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00113.html (10,493 bytes)
60. Re: [Amps] Amplified TV Antenna (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 17:36:10 -0700; REPLY: I have not forgotten it at all. That's where the "step" is. :-) On bad days (Santa Ana wind conditions - hot and dry) the low channels would be nearly useless and the high channels would be fi; /archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00114.html (10,023 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]