Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Amplifier\s+Linearity\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Amplifier\s+Linearity\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Amps] Amplifier Linearity (score: 1): Author: Bryan Swadener <bswadener@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 23:22:58 -0700 (PDT); Hi Ed, You can count me as one who saw the light in the 70s. I had purchased my used SB220 and (at first) adjusted it for maximum CW/single-tone output before operating in the SSB mode. It was shortl; /archives//html/Amps/2007-09/msg00360.html (8,105 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Amplifier Linearity (score: 1): Author: "Roger Halstead" <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 03:35:18 -0400; I thought that was what Class C was all about? <:-)) 73 Roger (K8RI) _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinf; /archives//html/Amps/2007-09/msg00368.html (8,986 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Amplifier Linearity (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 07:59:51 -0400; A long accepted rule of thumb to approximate the sweet spot for linearity is to load to maximum CW output and then increase loading (less C) until the output decreases 3-5%. Having a scope is nice if; /archives//html/Amps/2007-09/msg00378.html (9,824 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]