Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Amplifier\s+classes\s+in\s+solid\s+state\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Amplifier\s+classes\s+in\s+solid\s+state\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Amplifier classes in solid state (score: 1): Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@ezwv.com>; Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 12:56:05 -0500; Hey all, I gotta ask this question; Is the amplifier classes A, AB1, AB2, B, and C valid for solid state devices? Now my training says it is as the base of a semiconductor is the same as the grid on; /archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00608.html (6,916 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Amplifier classes in solid state (score: 1): Author: "Steve Thompson" <g8gsq@ic24.net>; Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 19:09:29 +0100; The class labels are used just the same, and are applied in similar situations. AB1 is usually used to describe class AB with low quiescent bias, AB2 with higher quiescent bias - you don't have the e; /archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00609.html (8,388 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Amplifier classes in solid state (score: 1): Author: jeff millar <wa1hco@adelphia.net>; Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 13:21:19 -0500; Interesting question. The original definitions certainly have tube origins. But the classes also map into conduction angle and linearity effects...which applies to all amplifiers. Setting aside the d; /archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00610.html (9,637 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] Amplifier classes in solid state (score: 1): Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@ezwv.com>; Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 13:27:17 -0500; Steve, That's just what I thought. I knew mosfets were close to acting like a tube, and seems to me there was a specific type they termed tetrode action on one. Transistors should act similar to a tr; /archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00611.html (9,605 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] Amplifier classes in solid state (score: 1): Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@ezwv.com>; Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 13:38:12 -0500; Jeff, I totally agree about class AB2. A, AB and AB1 can be set by the bias on the base or the gate. No bias and you have class C. It's not the component differences themselves which has to do with t; /archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00612.html (10,309 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] Amplifier classes in solid state (score: 1): Author: "Steve Thompson" <g8gsq@ic24.net>; Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 21:58:03 +0100; That's the way I view it. You draw a load line on the constant current curves, and the class of operation is defined by where you put the bias point - irrespective of the device that's being used. Ch; /archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00613.html (8,225 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] Amplifier classes in solid state (score: 1): Author: G3rzp@aol.com; Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 02:46:56 EST; To me, I cant see any difference in the action of a triode or a transistor if the transistor is biased correctly. The main difference is the way the collector/drain/plate current varies with collecto; /archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00622.html (7,947 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]