Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Amps\s+comparison\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Amps\s+comparison\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Amps] Amps comparison (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson" <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:43:32 -0600; At the risk of raising the hackles of the amp experts I'll weigh in with heretical advice: Buy neither and save some more money and go with a new amp from Ameritron. In the long run you'll be glad. A; /archives//html/Amps/2009-01/msg00167.html (7,535 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Amps comparison (score: 1): Author: Colin Lamb <k7fm@teleport.com>; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 13:10:50 -0800 (GMT-08:00); Another amp to consider is the Ameritron ALS-500M. Since it is solid state, it does not require tuning. This would be an advantage for a blind ham. The power is not as great, but it does have an adva; /archives//html/Amps/2009-01/msg00168.html (7,411 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Amps comparison (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:17:11 -0500; If I had a choice between an AL-80A or B and a TL-922 its a no brainer and the TL-922 wins hands down. Beating a single 3-500Z with 100W and bragging about getting 800-1000W (typical on the air comme; /archives//html/Amps/2009-01/msg00179.html (9,845 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] Amps comparison (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson" <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:56:37 -0600; Although Ameritron says the customer can achieve 1 kw output from an AL80B, I don't think anyone here recommended doing that. In fact, it appears that 800 w., which I previously thought was reasonabl; /archives//html/Amps/2009-01/msg00182.html (9,014 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]