Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Bad\s+tubes\s+from\s+ebay\,\s+update\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Bad\s+tubes\s+from\s+ebay\,\s+update\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Bad tubes from ebay, update (score: 1): Author: Larry <larry@w7iuv.com>; Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:16:30 -0800; Several months ago I posted a note about my experiences buying tubes from east European sellers on ebay. Some of the details are at http://w7iuv.com/badtubes.html The problems with the seller "exland; /archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00271.html (7,381 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Bad tubes from ebay, update (score: 1): Author: "k7rdx" <k7rdx@charter.net>; Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 15:20:22 -0800; Russian tubes are really great for what they cost...American tubes cost more but you get much more...73,Jim K7RDX... -- Original Message -- From: "Larry" <larry@w7iuv.com> To: "AMPS" <amps@contesting; /archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00272.html (9,229 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Bad tubes from ebay, update (score: 1): Author: "Robert B. Bonner" <rbonner@qro.com>; Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 17:35:38 -0600; Larry you hit the nail on the head. I have bought a pile of tubes off eBay none of them have come from Russian Sources. If the seller claims not tested, or good tube, whatever, I always contact them,; /archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00273.html (10,808 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] Bad tubes from ebay, update (score: 1): Author: Gudguyham@aol.com; Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 19:08:28 EST; I'm not sure I'll ever want to take a chance on something like this happening again. I much prefer to buy tubes from someone close by so that I can strap on my .45 and personally carry the tube back; /archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00274.html (7,729 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] Bad tubes from ebay, update (score: 1): Author: Gudguyham@aol.com; Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 19:12:50 EST; Russian tubes are really great for what they cost...American tubes cost more but you get much more...73,Jim K7RDX... Jim, You're so right. With all things being equal here is what I discovered. An 88; /archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00275.html (7,814 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] Bad tubes from ebay, update (score: 1): Author: Gudguyham@aol.com; Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 19:26:30 EST; Not only is it unprofessional to "STICK" another guy with a bad tube, but it will get you a very bad reputation quickly. I learned this basic philosophy from Tom Bruckner who he and I had traded on m; /archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00276.html (8,042 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] Bad tubes from ebay, update (score: 1): Author: "Patrick A. Thompson Sr." <wa4tuk-rf@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 20:13:27 -0500; I won't disagree with your conclusions about the pitfalls of buying cold war surplus tubes; however, I thought Anthony Welsh was a British ham/electronics dealer? For what it's worth, I've bought rel; /archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00277.html (9,224 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] Bad tubes from ebay, update (score: 1): Author: "k7rdx" <k7rdx@charter.net>; Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 19:54:24 -0800; I built my first Russian tube in 1998 (GS-35b) after a ham friend swapped me a tube at the Puyallup electronics flea market (In the Seattle area) I was quite impressed at the time with how well it wo; /archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00278.html (11,037 bytes)
9. Re: [Amps] Bad tubes from ebay, update (score: 1): Author: Bob Sutton <zl1rs@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 07:25:09 +0000 (GMT); Larry and group, My experience with "exland" on eBay has also been bad, even if for a slightly different reason ... but, in the end, with the same result - a very unhelpful trader and no resolution w; /archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00281.html (12,915 bytes)
10. Re: [Amps] Bad tubes from ebay, update (score: 1): Author: "Robert B. Bonner" <rbonner@qro.com>; Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 02:00:38 -0600; Bob don't let 3 months elapse this is possibly what he's trying to pull now at this point with the delays. Once that happens YOU CANNOT POST A NEGATIVE... and then you are completely screwed. Tell hi; /archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00282.html (14,082 bytes)
11. Re: [Amps] Bad tubes from ebay, update (score: 1): Author: Steve Thompson <g8gsq@eltac.co.uk>; Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:00:56 +0000; I think it's worth considering the context of the 500hrs. I suspect it's heavy duty, adverse conditions as these things were primarily for a military/airborne market. There's nothing fragile about th; /archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00283.html (8,741 bytes)
12. Re: [Amps] Bad tubes from ebay, update (score: 1): Author: "Rick Stealey" <rstealey@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:14:19 +0000; I did some investigating on exland on eBay. I have found feedback ratings of less than 99% or so are very bad so when I see 95% for exland it would make me really think twice about doing business wit; /archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00319.html (8,975 bytes)
13. Re: [Amps] Bad tubes from ebay, update (score: 1): Author: "Robert B. Bonner" <rbonner@qro.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:50:14 -0600; A potential negative feedback should bring in a negotiating team from eBay and the situation negotiated to a successful finish or permanent deletion of the seller. They should earn their money at eBa; /archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00322.html (9,344 bytes)
14. Re: [Amps] Bad tubes from ebay, update (score: 1): Author: PlanerGuy@aol.com; Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:21:45 EST; In a message dated 1/29/2007 12:51:07 PM Eastern Standard Time, rbonner@qro.com writes: The only advantage I see in doing that is an attempt to get even with the guy or possibly use it as a threat if; /archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00323.html (9,959 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]