Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Bandswicth\s+failure\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Bandswicth\s+failure\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Bandswicth failure (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 05:35:13 -0400; Rich replied: Another technical misstatement. The SB-220 switch is from the same Centralab family used in the lower voltage Ameritron amps, Dentron amps, and many other places. Like any switch, it ha; /archives//html/Amps/2006-06/msg00619.html (9,650 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Bandswicth failure (score: 1): Author: R L Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 04:49:03 -0700; Agreed . . I'm semi-obviously talking about the stationary open contacts that are the most prone to arc during the 110MHz oscillation -- i. e., , 10m, 15m. and, to a lesser extent, the 20m fixed L co; /archives//html/Amps/2006-06/msg00623.html (11,004 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Bandswicth failure (score: 1): Author: "Phil Clements" <philc@texascellnet.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 11:56:00 -0500; So true, Tom, as I have had my share of switch failures over the years due to poor lead dress, improper soldering techniques, and poor layout. I remember that on the Heath SB-1000 they had you insta; /archives//html/Amps/2006-06/msg00636.html (8,630 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]