- 1. [Amps] Basic transformer theory (score: 1)
- Author: EVonvaltie@aol.com (EVonvaltie@aol.com)
- Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 12:05:57 EDT
- Sorry - none of you has it right. Here is how it goes: At no load, the primary sits there drawing a current which is V/X, where X is the inductive reactance of the primary. This current is commonly r
- /archives//html/Amps/2002-05/msg00071.html (8,563 bytes)
- 2. [Amps] Basic transformer theory (score: 1)
- Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Mike)
- Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 21:57:28 -0700
- Thanks for clearing that up, Eric. I have been saturated with work, and my personal life has been in flux, so I was reluctant to pull out my electromagnetics textbook in order to get to the core of t
- /archives//html/Amps/2002-05/msg00073.html (9,745 bytes)
- 3. Fwd: [Amps] Basic transformer theory (score: 1)
- Author: EVonvaltie@aol.com (EVonvaltie@aol.com)
- Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 08:25:42 EDT
- -- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts -- multipart/mixed text/plain (text body -- kept) message/rfc822 --
- /archives//html/Amps/2002-05/msg00079.html (6,628 bytes)
- 4. [Amps] Basic transformer theory (score: 1)
- Author: w2ge@arrl.net (Phil Levin W2GE)
- Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 08:52:08 -0400
- ??????????? I believe all was removed by the "server". Plain text only, no HTML............ -- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts -- multipart/mixed text/plain (text body -- kept) message/rfc82
- /archives//html/Amps/2002-05/msg00081.html (7,239 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu