Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Bill\'s\s+novel\s+idea\s+of\s+parasitic\s+suppression\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Bill\'s\s+novel\s+idea\s+of\s+parasitic\s+suppression\.\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Bill's novel idea of parasitic suppression. (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <Jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 02:41:59 -0700; Bill, wrt had mentioned abt using a variable cap in series with a coil, in series with a resistor, all wired between cathode and chassis, to eliminate parasitics. I think the idea of the resistor was; /archives//html/Amps/2010-04/msg00444.html (7,391 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Bill's novel idea of parasitic suppression. (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 10:28:11 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: My thinking on the resistor is to broaden the width of the trap. This may or may not be necessary depending on how much the resonant freq of the anode parasitic varies with c; /archives//html/Amps/2010-04/msg00449.html (8,288 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]