Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Bird\s+wattmeter\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Bird\s+wattmeter\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [Amps] Bird wattmeter (score: 1): Author: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 12:02:21 +0200 (CEST); ones I have measure 1399, 1406 and 1393 ohms. The 1399 ohm meter reads about 10% low with 30 microamps thru it. The 1406 ohm meter reads about 5% low with 30 micromaps thru it. The other meter is way; /archives//html/Amps/2007-05/msg00075.html (8,668 bytes)
22. Re: [Amps] Bird wattmeter (score: 1): Author: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 12:07:37 +0200 (CEST); I've never opened up a Bird meter. Does it (like some meters do) have an adjustable magnetic shunt that you can adjust by loosening a screw and moving a piece of material attached to the magent? 73 P; /archives//html/Amps/2007-05/msg00076.html (8,153 bytes)
23. Re: [Amps] Bird wattmeter (score: 1): Author: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 12:24:39 +0200 (CEST); Let's not lose sight f the fact that an Accredited Test Laboratory is expected to have a measurement uncertainty to a 95% certainty level for conducted power of less than +/-0.75dB. That takes into a; /archives//html/Amps/2007-05/msg00077.html (8,712 bytes)
24. Re: [Amps] Bird wattmeter (score: 1): Author: "Gary Smith" <wa6fgi@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 07:47:55 -0700; To all: I agree the Bird wattmeter is the "standard" that most swear (at?) by. Also, Array solutions is a very good instrument but Imo, not really to suitable for everyday field use. Big question is:; /archives//html/Amps/2007-05/msg00085.html (10,009 bytes)
25. Re: [Amps] Bird wattmeter (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 11:21:02 -0400; Gary, You listened to the hyperbole of the salesman who said 10%. The Bird is +-5%. That means with a 100 watt slug at full scale it is 95-105 watts, not 90 to 110. Quit listening to salesmen. :-) 7; /archives//html/Amps/2007-05/msg00086.html (9,698 bytes)
26. Re: [Amps] Bird wattmeter (score: 1): Author: John Becker <johnb3030@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 08:38:39 -0500; While we're on the subject of Wattmeters, Has anyone here had an opportunity to compare the Array Solutions PowerMaster with N8LP's LP-100 Digital Vector Wattmeter? If so, an objective comparison of; /archives//html/Amps/2007-05/msg00088.html (7,675 bytes)
27. Re: [Amps] Bird wattmeter (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 10:45:49 -0400; The LP-100 was designed with a special emphasis placed on the directional coupler in order to attain a very high degree of port directivity and isolation, and is an instrument that is capable of mor; /archives//html/Amps/2007-05/msg00089.html (9,300 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 27
Page: [1] [2]