Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Blocking\s+capacitor\s+drift\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Blocking\s+capacitor\s+drift\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Blocking capacitor drift (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 00:40:53 -0400; You really ought to send the capacitor that drifts and doesn't burn up to a science museum!!! Let's assume the tube loadline is 3000 ohms and see if that claim makes any sense at all: A 1000 pF cap; /archives//html/Amps/2007-09/msg00502.html (9,166 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Blocking capacitor drift (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 08:46:28 -0400; More wasted drivel and bandwidth when your last paragraph says it all in a nutshell. A defective cap can be breaking down internally before it shows any external sign of its impending destruction. Th; /archives//html/Amps/2007-09/msg00508.html (10,659 bytes)
3. [Amps] Blocking capacitor drift (score: 1): Author: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>; Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 15:29:08 +0200 (CEST); My experience with ceramic caps of this sort is not so much drift in capacity as apparent upwards drift in loss. Even if a coupling capacitor did drift in capacity, as Tom points out, you wouldn't re; /archives//html/Amps/2007-09/msg00512.html (7,237 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] Blocking capacitor drift (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 10:10:48 -0400; We are on the same page Peter. Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps; /archives//html/Amps/2007-09/msg00514.html (7,992 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]