Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Boycott\s+New\s+Chinese\s+linear\s+Amplifier\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Boycott New Chinese linear Amplifier (score: 1)
Author: "Fern Rivard" <crc@cyberlink.bc.ca>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 07:47:17 -0600
I don't know what that "chinese" linear sells for but because it is obviously a "copy" of one sold by Ameritron, we should simply boycott that unit in America and NOT buy it! Fern ___________________
/archives//html/Amps/2006-09/msg00381.html (10,561 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] Boycott New Chinese linear Amplifier (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 10:19:37 -0400
The real point I was trying to make is there could be many improvements made in that basic design if the Chinese actually put some creative engineering into the product. A better product at the same
/archives//html/Amps/2006-09/msg00382.html (10,055 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] Boycott New Chinese linear Amplifier (score: 1)
Author: "Hsu" <Jbenson@sohu.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 03:13:38 +0800
Hi, I do not want to deny it is the ''copy" of AL811, especially in cabinnet and posion of the parts. But not all.One of builders is my friend,so I know something about it.The amplifier what they bui
/archives//html/Amps/2006-09/msg00383.html (13,053 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] Boycott New Chinese linear Amplifier (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 20:48:57 -0400
Please tell us how it is better. 73 Tom _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2006-09/msg00386.html (8,743 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] Boycott New Chinese linear Amplifier (score: 1)
Author: "Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 21:10:24 -0400
OK ... time to end this thread. There is nothing technical here any discussions of business ethics, trade, etc. belong elsewhere. 73, ... Administrator amps@contesting.com ___________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2006-09/msg00387.html (11,309 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] Boycott New Chinese linear Amplifier (score: 1)
Author: "Rocky Clayton" <rclayton@ev1.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 00:01:09 -0500
550.00 Rocky -- Original Message -- From: "Fern Rivard" <crc@cyberlink.bc.ca> To: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; "Hsu" <Jbenson@sohu.com>; "kenw2dtc" <kenw2dtc@comcast.net> Cc: <amps@contesting.com> Sen
/archives//html/Amps/2006-10/msg00000.html (9,672 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] Boycott New Chinese linear Amplifier (score: 1)
Author: "Hsu" <Jbenson@sohu.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 16:39:47 +0800
Craft. you can see the diffrence between the amp and AL-811.I do not know why some american amp's so bad craft. myebe due to the cost.Many old American and Japese amps is very good, I have seen Colli
/archives//html/Amps/2006-10/msg00001.html (8,038 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] Boycott New Chinese linear Amplifier (score: 1)
Author: "Hsu" <Jbenson@sohu.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 08:06:07 +0800
Tom, It seems you do not know some Chinese tube's history. 811 was called FU-811 in China . it is copy from Russian G-811, 813 was called FU-13, it is copy from Russian GU-13. Chinese 811 and 813 hav
/archives//html/Amps/2006-10/msg00007.html (11,103 bytes)

9. Re: [Amps] Boycott New Chinese linear Amplifier (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 21:21:20 -0400
Hsu, Respectfully you are missing my point. When people copy and repeat something else it is almost never really improved. It is simply the same path and no major change. Major change or improvement
/archives//html/Amps/2006-10/msg00008.html (9,436 bytes)

10. Re: [Amps] Boycott New Chinese linear Amplifier (score: 1)
Author: "Hsu" <Jbenson@sohu.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 10:50:14 +0800
Tom, Maybe you are right.These tube factory are "pure" state factory, without any foreign capital back grund. Its rigescent system kill any person's appetency of innovation. But not all.for example ,
/archives//html/Amps/2006-10/msg00009.html (9,308 bytes)

11. Re: [Amps] Boycott New Chinese linear Amplifier (score: 1)
Author: "Van K7VS" <wa7fab@cdsnet.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 20:45:57 -0700
Dear Hsu. I think its great your friend has built an amp for the Chinese market. Wonderful. As a matter of fact, regarding the copying of technical equipment. At the end of World War Two we copied ma
/archives//html/Amps/2006-10/msg00010.html (8,133 bytes)

12. Re: [Amps] Boycott New Chinese linear Amplifier (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Maser" <bmaser@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 00:03:38 -0400
Isn't it time to bring the curtain down on this thread? Copying an Ameritron amplifier is like trying to perform a hemorrhoid transplant. Bob W6TR -- Original Message -- From: "Hsu" <Jbenson@sohu.com
/archives//html/Amps/2006-10/msg00012.html (10,939 bytes)

13. Re: [Amps] Boycott New Chinese linear Amplifier (score: 1)
Author: Gudguyham@aol.com
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 07:31:33 EDT
Isn't it time to bring the curtain down on this thread? Copying an Ameritron amplifier is like trying to perform a hemorrhoid transplant. Bob W6TR Chortle Bob ________________________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2006-10/msg00013.html (7,984 bytes)

14. Re: [Amps] Boycott New Chinese linear Amplifier (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 07:35:41 -0700
Bob, I'm like you, there's a bunch of other amps that are much better candidates. Even in this case, Hsu's friend had to make modifications and corrections to make it boatworthy. However, I have lear
/archives//html/Amps/2006-10/msg00014.html (12,115 bytes)

15. Re: [Amps] Boycott New Chinese linear Amplifier (score: 1)
Author: Gudguyham@aol.com
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 10:24:27 EDT
I would like to talk to him about some other tubes no longer available and who might revive them like the 6LF6. I could sell a ton of them in the US right now. Best, Will CBer's love these tubes.....
/archives//html/Amps/2006-10/msg00016.html (8,156 bytes)

16. Re: [Amps] Boycott New Chinese linear Amplifier (score: 1)
Author: Administrator <amps@myrealbox.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 15:08:15 -0500
I told you morons to stop this thread. Nothing techinical here. Am I going to have to throw you all out of here. The list founder told me to clean up this mess and I will. -- Sign up and get your 30G
/archives//html/Amps/2006-10/msg00023.html (6,480 bytes)

17. Re: [Amps] Boycott New Chinese linear Amplifier (score: 1)
Author: dcoffman@iquest.net
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 17:05:03 -0400
I don't think that Morons is the appropriate choice of words here. Is this not the type of behavior that you, as the administrator, are attempting to thwart? Do as I do and not as I say? Have a nice
/archives//html/Amps/2006-10/msg00024.html (8,004 bytes)

18. Re: [Amps] Boycott New Chinese linear Amplifier (score: 1)
Author: "Mike, K6BR" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 14:32:30 -0700
Noun 1. moron - a person of subnormal intelligence. I think most of the Morons left this group, because they did not have the ability to type, just us Cretins (idiots) left:( --Original Message-- Fro
/archives//html/Amps/2006-10/msg00025.html (9,159 bytes)

19. Re: [Amps] Boycott New Chinese linear Amplifier (score: 1)
Author: "Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 17:50:26 -0400
I have modified the group settings so the administrator account cannot be (mis)used again. Unfortunately, this simply proves that the e-mail address on ANY posting to the group can be forged (spoofed
/archives//html/Amps/2006-10/msg00026.html (8,483 bytes)

20. Re: [Amps] Boycott New Chinese linear Amplifier (score: 1)
Author: "Hsu" <Jbenson@sohu.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 06:16:16 +0800
I just oppress the impulsion of name-calling. Thank God, it seems it is a misapprehension. As a gentleman, I seldom use indelicate word, but it not means I can not say that words 73! Hsu -- Original
/archives//html/Amps/2006-10/msg00027.html (10,418 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu