Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Burn\-in\s+for\s+Eimac\?\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [Amps] Burn-in for Eimac? (score: 1)
Author: "Ian White, GM3SEK" <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 18:49:55 +0000
Just arrived home to read Rich, Karl-Arne, then Rich again... Thanks, Karl-Arne, that's a very interesting reference. It's hard to choose exactly the right words to describe what happens at the metal
/archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00429.html (10,313 bytes)

22. Re: [Amps] Burn-in for Eimac? (score: 1)
Author: Karl-Arne Markstr&ouml;m <sm0aom@telia.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 21:22:16 +0100
I now more throughly understand that "gettering" involves the very complicated discipline of "surface physics" which appears to be some kind of "twilight zone" between chemistry and physics. The word
/archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00432.html (11,985 bytes)

23. Re: [Amps] Burn-in for Eimac? (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 12:32:10 -0800
What element would easily form a co-valent bond with N2? So there is nothing to be gained by running the filament? In the past I have always operated new 3-500Zs at normal anode temperatures without
/archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00433.html (10,952 bytes)

24. Re: [Amps] Burn-in for Eimac? (score: 1)
Author: "Ian White, GM3SEK" <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 22:47:00 +0000
That's about right - you can look at 'physical chemistry' from both viewpoints, which makes it interesting. However, most chemists think it's too much like physics, while most physicists think it's t
/archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00436.html (9,316 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu