Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+CB\'ers\s+\-\s+what\s+\*IS\*\s+the\s+problem\,\s+anyway\?\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+CB\'ers\s+\-\s+what\s+\*IS\*\s+the\s+problem\,\s+anyway\?\?\?\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] CB'ers - what *IS* the problem, anyway??? (score: 1): Author: cloutier@bicnet.net (Steve Cloutier, 978-597-3311); Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2002 09:24:41 -0500; Hmm.. What *IS* the real difference between a modern "Amateur" operator and a CB'er, anyway. Yes, back in the old days (before the dumbing down of the amateur radio test) there was a real technical d; /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00108.html (11,690 bytes)
2. [Amps] CB'ers - what *IS* the problem, anyway??? (score: 1): Author: majrabsr@rconnect.com (Major Ron); Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 15:12:41 -0000; OK Steve, Since you asked, the *REAL* difference between CB'ers who are operating out-of-band or using illegal power is that what they are doing is ILLEGAL! Hams, by virtue of their license, are allo; /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00110.html (13,267 bytes)
3. [Amps] CB'ers - what *IS* the problem, anyway??? (score: 1): Author: wlfuqu00@uky.edu (wl fuqua); Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2002 10:45:38 -0500; There is still a difference Ham: Have call signs, identify themselves and do so proudly Have standards of operation and rules that must be followed Have system of monitoring and reporting problems wi; /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00111.html (14,721 bytes)
4. [Amps] CB'ers - what *IS* the problem, anyway??? (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (Rich); Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 09:26:17 -0800; ** Last week, I received several e-mails and telephone calls from a CBer who was constructing a 3cx15,000A7 AB2 g-g amp. using a 3kV anode supply. He was having problems getting it to work properly,; /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00113.html (8,535 bytes)
5. [Amps] CB'ers - what *IS* the problem, anyway??? (score: 1): Author: cloutier@bicnet.net (Steve Cloutier, 978-597-3311); Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2002 12:41:02 -0500; Hi! This particular thread seems to be staying at an intelligent level But, my experience contradicts the last set of comments ..... to wit: SOMETIMES - sometimes, not. We *regularly* have problems w; /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00116.html (10,793 bytes)
6. [Amps] CB'ers - what *IS* the problem, anyway??? (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (Rich); Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 12:10:52 -0800; I get jammed regularly on 7255kHz by Hams. Some Hams run tetrode with handles amplifiers in contests and have no qualms about signing the FCC rules compliance statement on the contest entry form. I; /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00122.html (16,667 bytes)
7. [Amps] CB'ers - what *IS* the problem, anyway??? (score: 1): Author: wlfuqu00@uky.edu (Bill Fuqua); Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2002 15:41:27 -0500; Yes, there are exceptions to the rule. But, you are talking of a small number of hams in the community. A few bad apples do sour the barrel. However, the "illegal CB" operators are all bad apples. 73; /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00124.html (18,124 bytes)
8. [Amps] CB'ers - what *IS* the problem, anyway??? (score: 1): Author: wlfuqu00@uky.edu (Bill Fuqua); Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2002 17:06:36 -0500; Sorry if that bothers you. Too, many think hams are a lazy bunch and confuse us with CBers. If you have knowledge it is best to share it. My ham related class is aimed at younger students. That does; /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00126.html (9,990 bytes)
9. [Amps] CB'ers - what *IS* the problem, anyway??? (score: 1): Author: k6nd@netzero.com (Will); Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 12:47:24 GMT; Didn't I ask friendly to go back to normal amplifier issues? Please leave it alone and let?s talk about amplifiers! Best Regards, Will, K6ND Co-List administrator Yes, there are exceptions to the rul; /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00131.html (18,555 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]