Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+CB\s+amp\s+directly\s+coupled\s+via\s+cap\s+to\s+antenna\s*$/: 34 ]

Total 34 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [Amps] CB amp directly coupled via cap to antenna (score: 1)
Author: Bill Fuqua <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 23:03:12 -0400
If what you say is true then no resonant circuit has Q. In series resonance Q= Xc/R or you can use inductive reactance. they are equal at resonance. In parallel Q=R/Xc 73 Bill wa4lav ________________
/archives//html/Amps/2010-04/msg00292.html (11,381 bytes)

22. Re: [Amps] CB amp directly coupled via cap to antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Hardy Landskov" <n7rt@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 21:58:55 -0700
Actually a match is dertermined by the ratio of the antenna Z to the tranzmission line Z. The generater Z has nothing to do with it. At least that is what I remember. So all these amp specs are irrel
/archives//html/Amps/2010-04/msg00294.html (11,169 bytes)

23. Re: [Amps] CB amp directly coupled via cap to antenna (score: 1)
Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 02:16:29 -0400
But there is no transmission line. So does the tube output, coupling cap, or antenna become part of the transmission line? But first to address the issue of Standing waves on the antenna: my old engi
/archives//html/Amps/2010-04/msg00295.html (15,776 bytes)

24. Re: [Amps] CB amp directly coupled via cap to antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 23:49:10 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: In this case, there is no transmission line and no matching network (pi-net), so the generator Z is important. In a normal amp, the pi-net transforms the tube's plate load re
/archives//html/Amps/2010-04/msg00296.html (10,022 bytes)

25. Re: [Amps] CB amp directly coupled via cap to antenna (score: 1)
Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 02:55:25 -0400
Do w even care if it has a flywheel effect? We really don't care what the wave form is, we don't care about IM, or cleanliness, and we don't care about harmonics so who cares if the whole wave form i
/archives//html/Amps/2010-04/msg00297.html (10,546 bytes)

26. Re: [Amps] CB amp directly coupled via cap to antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:13:17 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: In this case, we are dealing with an end-fed half wave vertical, which has a feedpoint impedance of several thousand ohms, essentially the same as the tube's plate load imped
/archives//html/Amps/2010-04/msg00300.html (10,062 bytes)

27. Re: [Amps] CB amp directly coupled via cap to antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:16:15 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Point taken in the case of the CB idiots. Field strength trumps everything. Please excuse me for thinking like a ham. :-) 73, Bill W6WRT _____________________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2010-04/msg00301.html (9,123 bytes)

28. Re: [Amps] CB amp directly coupled via cap to antenna (score: 1)
Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 03:57:51 -0400
Not quite. It's true the formula is either X/R or R/X and at resonance Xc and Xl are equal. But the formula says to use EITHER Xc or Xl, not both which would be zero at resonance. 73 Roger (K8RI) ___
/archives//html/Amps/2010-04/msg00341.html (12,860 bytes)

29. Re: [Amps] CB amp directly coupled via cap to antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Fuqua, Bill L" <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 03:04:03 -0400
Sorry, I clicked on the wrong email. I was responding to Gerald's (K5GW) email where he was in error about resonance and Q. Also, most of us are familiar with R,X and Q and also Bandwidth, Center Fre
/archives//html/Amps/2010-04/msg00368.html (13,856 bytes)

30. Re: [Amps] CB amp directly coupled via cap to antenna (score: 1)
Author: TexasRF@aol.com
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 10:44:09 EDT
Bill, I think you missed part of the discussion:we were not talking about tuned circuits. We were talking about an amplifier with no tank circuit being coupled directly (no transmission line) to an a
/archives//html/Amps/2010-04/msg00373.html (14,407 bytes)

31. Re: [Amps] CB amp directly coupled via cap to antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 10:22:37 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: If a parallel resonant circuit has infinite reactance, how does any energy get into it in the first place? Infinite reactance = zero current flow. 73, Bill W6WRT ____________
/archives//html/Amps/2010-04/msg00384.html (9,168 bytes)

32. Re: [Amps] CB amp directly coupled via cap to antenna (score: 1)
Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:46:16 -0400
Yup! <:-)) 73 Roger (K8RI) _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2010-04/msg00390.html (15,396 bytes)

33. Re: [Amps] CB amp directly coupled via cap to antenna (score: 1)
Author: Ron Youvan <ka4inm@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 01:31:29 +0000
I was taught a resonant antenna is a tank circuit, antennas usually have some figure of "Q" over 1 and if some of it's capacitance is contributed by the plate to ground of a power tube I don't see h
/archives//html/Amps/2010-04/msg00401.html (8,938 bytes)

34. Re: [Amps] CB amp directly coupled via cap to antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 21:54:03 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Sounds reasonable. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2010-04/msg00408.html (8,892 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu