Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+CTI\s+follow\s+up\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+CTI\s+follow\s+up\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] CTI follow up (score: 1): Author: nospam4me@juno.com (skipp isaham); Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 20:44:35 -0700; re: CTI amplifiers ("The reply") - Hello again, - I wrote Bob back about responding to his statements regarding the use of tube regulators, to inform him of amps and invite him to join and to mention; /archives//html/Amps/2002-06/msg00204.html (10,195 bytes)
2. [Amps] CTI follow up (score: 1): Author: wb8jkr@juno.com (wb8jkr@juno.com); Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 05:12:02 -0400; Seems to me the first guy to start really barking is usually the one losing the argument, this guy's way TOO defensive. Mark WB8JKR On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 20:44:35 -0700 skipp isaham <nospam4me@juno.com; /archives//html/Amps/2002-06/msg00205.html (11,174 bytes)
3. [Amps] CTI follow up (score: 1): Author: g8gsq@qsl.net (Steve Thompson); Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 11:06:15 +0000; Out of interest, does anyone have figures for the dynamic regulation of gas tubes? I reckon a string of zeners will run at about 100 ohms so that would give 1-2V ripple on a '250 screen, depending o; /archives//html/Amps/2002-06/msg00206.html (7,843 bytes)
4. [Amps] CTI follow up (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 06:51:03 -0400; Hmmm. If it is a crock of what he says, then the gas regulator must have low elasticity or the internal pressure buildup is too great. Fewer dinners at Del Taco will help. Why all the attention anyw; /archives//html/Amps/2002-06/msg00208.html (7,862 bytes)
5. [Amps] CTI follow up (score: 1): Author: 2@mail.vcnet.com (Richard); Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 05:16:49 -0700; To: <amps@contesting.com> ** Translation: Any loudmouth who takes issue with any of My statements is absolutely wrong, every time. and that's the botom-line. A 2w control grid in cathode driven serv; /archives//html/Amps/2002-06/msg00210.html (11,840 bytes)
6. [Amps] CTI follow up (score: 1): Author: 2@mail.vcnet.com (Richard); Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 05:16:51 -0700; * Amen, Mark. Bob got caught blathering and now he's fuming. - R. L. Measures, a.k.a. Rich..., 805.386.3734,AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures. end; /archives//html/Amps/2002-06/msg00211.html (7,940 bytes)
7. [Amps] CTI follow up (score: 1): Author: 2@mail.vcnet.com (Richard); Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 05:22:12 -0700; * Or maybe just avoid the frijoles/beans. ... - R. L. Measures, a.k.a. Rich..., 805.386.3734,AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures. end; /archives//html/Amps/2002-06/msg00212.html (7,680 bytes)
8. [Amps] CTI follow up (score: 1): Author: tongaloa@alltel.net (tongaloa); Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 12:59:25 -0400; Practical for the application or not, working gas tubes are aesthetically appealing. I especially like the LK-199. Anyone know an inexpensive source? -bob; /archives//html/Amps/2002-06/msg00214.html (7,433 bytes)
9. [Amps] CTI follow up (score: 1): Author: wc6w@juno.com (Radio WC6W); Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 10:13:17 -0700; gas would what Hi Steve, The value varies with the tube type and the total current excursion but, typically fall in the range of 50-200 ohms. 73 & Good morning, Marv WC6W * __________________________; /archives//html/Amps/2002-06/msg00215.html (8,072 bytes)
10. [Amps] CTI follow up (score: 1): Author: g8gsq@qsl.net (Steve Thompson); Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 18:34:39 +0100; Thanks, Marv - so there might not be much to choose apart from the pretty glow (unless the regulator tubes oscillate, been there, done that). Steve; /archives//html/Amps/2002-06/msg00216.html (8,265 bytes)
11. [Amps] CTI follow up (score: 1): Author: w2fca@cs.com (w2fca@cs.com); Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 14:37:41 -0400; Interesting quote from a web site devoted to the joys of tubes - "Gas regulators do not have very good dynamic response. Due to the time lag of the heavy ions that make up the discharge, they have ti; /archives//html/Amps/2002-06/msg00217.html (7,919 bytes)
12. [Amps] CTI follow up (score: 1): Author: g8gsq@qsl.net (Steve Thompson); Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 20:58:19 +0100; --Original Message-- From: w2fca@cs.com <w2fca@cs.com> To: "Steve Thompson" <g8gsq@qsl.net>; amps@contesting.com <amps@contesting.com> To: <amps@contesting.com> Date: 25 June 2002 19:38 Subject: Re:; /archives//html/Amps/2002-06/msg00218.html (8,399 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]