Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Center\s+Tapped\s+Secondary\s+Circuit\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Center\s+Tapped\s+Secondary\s+Circuit\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Center Tapped Secondary Circuit (score: 1): Author: "Angelo Karabetsos" <ve3yn@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 13:24:53 +0000; On a center tapped secondary plate transformer I have here there's three 2200pF 6Kv ceramic disc caps in parallel = 6600pF that are in series with three series 1K resistors = 3K between the center ta; /archives//html/Amps/2005-10/msg00454.html (7,644 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Center Tapped Secondary Circuit (score: 1): Author: "k7fm" <k7fm@teleport.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 06:42:28 -0700; Spike Protection _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps; /archives//html/Amps/2005-10/msg00455.html (6,809 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Center Tapped Secondary Circuit (score: 1): Author: "Jim Forsyth" <jim@forsyth.net>; Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 07:30:52 -0700; Transient suppression. Jim, AF6O _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps; /archives//html/Amps/2005-10/msg00459.html (7,088 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] Center Tapped Secondary Circuit (score: 1): Author: "Angelo Karabetsos" <ve3yn@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 15:32:05 +0000; What sort of transient would you expect at the secondary of a plate transformer? _________________________________________________________________ Take charge with a pop-up guard built on patented Mi; /archives//html/Amps/2005-10/msg00506.html (7,441 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] Center Tapped Secondary Circuit (score: 1): Author: "Angelo Karabetsos" <ve3yn@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 14:08:47 +0000; I assume in the mid 60's MOV's were not as common or not available. It would make sense to prevent it before amplification. I was thinking it was a circuit that balances the secondary windings. Thank; /archives//html/Amps/2005-10/msg00515.html (8,140 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] Center Tapped Secondary Circuit (score: 1): Author: "Carcia, Francis A HS" <francis.carcia@hs.utc.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 10:14:17 -0400; MOV failure mode is a fire cracker and they have a limited life. I assume in the mid 60's MOV's were not as common or not available. It would make sense to prevent it before amplification. I was thin; /archives//html/Amps/2005-10/msg00516.html (8,314 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] Center Tapped Secondary Circuit (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 08:56:29 -0700; That's why it is best to use a larger rather than a smaller MOV - possibly even one with Cu strap-leads instead of wire-leads. When it comes to transient suppressor devices, mo' smaller is not mo' be; /archives//html/Amps/2005-10/msg00517.html (9,210 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] Center Tapped Secondary Circuit (score: 1): Author: "Angelo Karabetsos" <ve3yn@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 22:09:15 +0000; Point taken, Mo bigger is better. VE3YN _________________________________________________________________ Powerful Parental Controls Let your child discover the best the Internet has to offer. http:/; /archives//html/Amps/2005-10/msg00538.html (8,171 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]