Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Challenger\s+III\s+Amp\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Challenger\s+III\s+Amp\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Challenger III Amp (score: 1): Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 19:49:06 -0400; Has anyone tried the new Challenger amps from the UK? Below is a link to a Challenger III listed by Anthony Welsh on ebay over in the UK. It uses the GS-35 triode. I noticed it uses a toroidal transf; /archives//html/Amps/2006-05/msg00256.html (6,698 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Challenger III Amp (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 09:59:05 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ** REPLY SEPARATOR ** Only rated for 1000 watts RTTY. The limiting factor appears to be the 2.2 kVA power transformer. Wonder why they didn't go for the max? Sigh. Bill, W6WRT _____; /archives//html/Amps/2006-05/msg00332.html (8,074 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Challenger III Amp (score: 1): Author: Scott Manthe <n9aa@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 12:58:42 -0500; Probably because the power limit in the UK is 400 watts. Scott, N9AA _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo; /archives//html/Amps/2006-05/msg00337.html (8,064 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] Challenger III Amp (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 15:25:12 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ** REPLY SEPARATOR ** That doesn't make sense since the amp is obviously designed to be used outside the UK. Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing; /archives//html/Amps/2006-05/msg00346.html (7,705 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]