Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Class\s+E\s+and\s+MRF492\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Class\s+E\s+and\s+MRF492\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Class E and MRF492 (score: 1): Author: Philip de Cadenet <phil@transmittersrus.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 17:52:02 +0000; They are suited for single-frequency operation. The difference between 60% efficiency and 90% efficiency with the same input power is 0.3 S-unit or 1.76db. ... but surely that also means smaller PA h; /archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00222.html (6,477 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Class E and MRF492 (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 02:37:44 -0800; surely, Phil, but is that worth the tradeoff of single-frequency operation? Richard L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734. www.somis.org _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Am; /archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00226.html (7,692 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Class E and MRF492 (score: 1): Author: Philip de Cadenet <phil@transmittersrus.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 12:27:13 +0000; I of course agree. Class-D is the way to go. Regards -- Philip de Cadenet Transmitters 'R' Us http://www.transmittersrus.com _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@co; /archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00228.html (7,009 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]