Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Clipperton\-L\s+parasitic\s+suppressors\s*$/: 46 ]

Total 46 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [Amps] Clipperton-L parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: "Cecil Acuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:10:14 -0600
--cut-- --cut-- I guess I'm kind of in that group of new participants but was also a member for a short while back when Mr. Measures was still active on the list. Things were so intense between he an
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00209.html (11,870 bytes)

22. Re: [Amps] Clipperton-L parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: Alek Petkovic <vk6apk@bigpond.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 06:06:07 +0800
That's gotta be the "Classic Line Of The Week" mate. I mean what is a parasitic suppressor? What is any parasitic suppressor? Is it not something that "attacks the symptom and not the problem"? Wheth
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00214.html (17,379 bytes)

23. Re: [Amps] Clipperton-L parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:17:20 -0500
To me this list has had (since the aforementioned problems) the lowest noise ratio of about any list I've been on. I may have a lot of time, but I've found out more about tubes and amps on here than
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00215.html (15,439 bytes)

24. Re: [Amps] Clipperton-L parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: Dave White <mausoptik@btinternet.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 00:16:41 +0100
Interestingly when I asked W6MTF at Eimac for some advice regarding parasitic suppression when I was first building my 3CX3000 amp a decade or so ago, he immediately advised me not to bother with sup
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00219.html (17,912 bytes)

25. Re: [Amps] Clipperton-L parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:56:58 -0500
I give up.... Carl _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00229.html (18,973 bytes)

26. Re: [Amps] Clipperton-L parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:03:47 -0500
All good points Roger. I remember a saying from decades ago that a few should consider on here and elsewhere when expecting others to take the time to try and help with a problem. "It is not a good
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00230.html (16,944 bytes)

27. Re: [Amps] Clipperton-L parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:34:16 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Rich's claims and statements have been analyzed to a fare-thee-well by others as well as himself and there is no voodoo involved. On the contrary, the naysayers have offered
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00234.html (10,092 bytes)

28. Re: [Amps] Clipperton-L parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:42:46 -0500
The concept of a "suppressor" is to suppress the parasitic from even starting. The Q of the strap, wire, coil, has nothing to do with the design. This is where the voodo starts. The coil of the suppr
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00236.html (20,434 bytes)

29. Re: [Amps] Clipperton-L parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:45:38 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: For a tube to oscillate, the circuit Q has to be high enough on both the anode and grid circuits, enough so the gain is one or more and the phase of the fed-back power is cor
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00237.html (9,200 bytes)

30. Re: [Amps] Clipperton-L parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 22:09:48 -0500
Id say that was a basic description of neutralization. Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/am
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00239.html (9,666 bytes)

31. Re: [Amps] Clipperton-L parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 22:11:24 -0500
Citations from credible people are??? Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00240.html (10,399 bytes)

32. Re: [Amps] Clipperton-L parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: Alek Petkovic <vk6apk@bigpond.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 15:08:07 +0800
An even better classic line. Two in one day. Thanks for the great laugh. Love you long time. 73, Alek.. http://www.qrz.com/db/vk6apk http://www.qrz.com/db/vk6py ______________________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00243.html (19,969 bytes)

33. Re: [Amps] Clipperton-L parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 05:46:18 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: This is the crux of the argument presented by the anit-Measures naysayers. Measures claims, and I agree, that a nichrome wire coil has lower Q than a copper one, and especial
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00245.html (9,994 bytes)

34. Re: [Amps] Clipperton-L parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 05:54:22 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: I'd say not. Neutralization can be done with very high Q and high impedance in both anode and grid circuits and involves deliberately feeding out-of-phase energy from anode b
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00246.html (9,113 bytes)

35. Re: [Amps] Clipperton-L parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 05:55:26 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Rich has published them many times. Keep looking. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00247.html (9,921 bytes)

36. Re: [Amps] Clipperton-L parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 11:51:22 -0400
I said credible and original sources, not 3rd-4th hand. Carl _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00248.html (10,496 bytes)

37. Re: [Amps] Clipperton-L parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 12:13:16 -0400
** No argument so far and especially so when skin effect is taken ** So what? We are discussing a HF amp where its the goal to transfer the maximum RF to the load and not heat up things unecessarily.
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00250.html (11,366 bytes)

38. Re: [Amps] Clipperton-L parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 11:10:12 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: I refer you to "The Art of Electronics" by Horowitz and Hall. A textbook I had in college and must reading for anyone serious about electronic design. Voodoo? Maybe. Your cal
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00253.html (9,439 bytes)

39. Re: [Amps] Clipperton-L parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 11:14:27 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Yes. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00254.html (10,103 bytes)

40. Re: [Amps] Clipperton-L parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 15:33:56 -0400
A play on words for students while maintaining the engineering method. Its actually by Horowitz and Hill. The term "art" was part of many textbooks, I guess it was done to impress the young and sell
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00255.html (10,354 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu