Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Conversation\s+stopper\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Conversation\s+stopper\?\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Conversation stopper? (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 16:20:59 -0800; ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The only "waste of bandwidth" I've seen so far is the above post. All the others had something to contribute. Ok, this one qualifies too. Sorry. :-); /archives//html/Amps/2005-11/msg00354.html (8,915 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Conversation stopper? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 21:25:45 -0500; Actually, Dr. Schmidt has a point ... those with software that puts **SPAM** in the subject line of reflector massages and don't edit it out on replies are *VERY* inconsiderate of the other reflector; /archives//html/Amps/2005-11/msg00357.html (10,588 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Conversation stopper? (score: 1): Author: "Dr. William J. Schmidt, II" <bill@wjschmidt.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 21:17:50 -0600; <<Those with software that puts **SPAM** in the subject line of reflector massages and don't edit it out on replies are *VERY* inconsiderate of the other reflector users. >> Unless the topic is House; /archives//html/Amps/2005-11/msg00359.html (12,504 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] Conversation stopper? (score: 1): Author: "Dr. William J. Schmidt, II" <bill@wjschmidt.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 21:29:01 -0600; Well, Bill...thanks for the personal attack. Its been my experience that we've been through much of the house wiring stuff over and over and over and over.... Its in the archives. Check back to your; /archives//html/Amps/2005-11/msg00360.html (10,974 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] Conversation stopper? (score: 1): Author: "Jim Tonne" <tonne@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 22:50:55 -0500; Come on, guys, settle down! Frankly I for one think the wiring thing has run its course. And I would be interested in the cheap high-power amplifier, even if just for CW. - JimT WB6BLD ______________; /archives//html/Amps/2005-11/msg00361.html (8,211 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] Conversation stopper? (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>; Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 07:51:22 -0800; ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Actually, I would like to hear about the solid-state amp, even though they have been discussed here before. Be sure to include information about the; /archives//html/Amps/2005-11/msg00371.html (8,666 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] Conversation stopper? (score: 1): Author: "Dr. William J. Schmidt, II" <bill@wjschmidt.com>; Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 10:43:21 -0600; Sorry, I've unsubscribed from the AMPS reflector. If you wish to see how to build a 2kw amp for under $600, please watch my website. I'll post the information there. Trust me, its new. Sincerely, Dr.; /archives//html/Amps/2005-11/msg00414.html (9,960 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]