Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+DIN\s+vs\s+N\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+DIN\s+vs\s+N\s*$/: 36 ]

Total 36 documents matching your query.

21. [Amps] DIN vs N (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 19:47:37 -0700; PL 259s I've personally witness run at 2Kw carrier, 10 Kw pep. N's AND BNC's I've seen about 5-6 kw carrier, 100 percent modulated. LC I've seen go to about 55Kw, modulated. I've seen the DIN go in t; /archives//html/Amps/2011-04/msg00534.html (10,932 bytes)
22. Re: [Amps] DIN vs N (score: 1): Author: Shane Youhouse <kd6vxi@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 20:05:41 -0700; Agreed on ALL parts. Position of connector + (in regards to band, etc) can ALL wreak havoc w ANY connector. The PL connector will eat ANY N \ BNC for lunch, with ANY reflected power below 10 meters.; /archives//html/Amps/2011-04/msg00535.html (12,050 bytes)
23. [Amps] DIN vs N (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 21:59:21 -0700; Maybe if you don't try to cover all of 75 or 160, but I've blown out N connectors (Amphenols no less) running no more than the legal limit on 75 a number of times. I use a tuner so I can cover all of; /archives//html/Amps/2011-04/msg00536.html (10,677 bytes)
24. Re: [Amps] DIN vs N (score: 1): Author: "Roger (sub1)" <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 03:27:15 -0400; So far I've only gone to a Fan. IE, I took a regular center fed, half wave, sloping dipole and added a second in parallel at the feed point. The ends are "fanned" out by 4' spreaders. There are no sp; /archives//html/Amps/2011-04/msg00537.html (9,907 bytes)
25. Re: [Amps] DIN vs N (score: 1): Author: "Sam Carpenter" <sam@owenscommunication.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:25:02 -0400; Almost everything about the argument is frequency dependant. I do a lot of work at 800 mHz. Often I will combine six or seven 100 watt transmitters to a single antenna with combiner cavities and circ; /archives//html/Amps/2011-04/msg00538.html (15,051 bytes)
26. Re: [Amps] DIN vs N (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:49:02 -0400; My 903 amp is a 100W SS cell module. As many as were needed were in a rack. I dont know if they were all combined or just a few per array. Mine runs cool and linear at 150W using an old heatsink I ha; /archives//html/Amps/2011-04/msg00539.html (10,063 bytes)
27. Re: [Amps] DIN vs N (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:49:57 -0400; Not quite Jim but Ive run 1200W into 3:1 on 40 and 20 and maybe a bit more on the high ends of 10/15. The old PV-4 design has a fast VSWR upturn on the high end and the 40M KLM's werent very broad ei; /archives//html/Amps/2011-04/msg00540.html (8,817 bytes)
28. Re: [Amps] DIN vs N (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:50:53 -0400; Those started over 25 years ago with Taiwan imports. All my PL-259, N, adaptors, etc, are USA, mostly mil-spec from decades of hamfests, etc; there are several other great brands besides Amphenol alt; /archives//html/Amps/2011-04/msg00541.html (11,299 bytes)
29. Re: [Amps] DIN vs N (score: 1): Author: Gudguyham@aol.com; Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:54:57 -0400 (EDT); there are several other great brands besides Amphenol Carl, as you may know I live in the same town as Amphenol headquarters have a few PL-259's and some right angle's? ______________________________; /archives//html/Amps/2011-04/msg00542.html (7,804 bytes)
30. Re: [Amps] DIN vs N (score: 1): Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:40:21 -0400; Five 100 watt transmitters combined is 2500 watts PEP that you have to worry about at the antenna port. 73 Gary K4FMX _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting; /archives//html/Amps/2011-04/msg00543.html (17,497 bytes)
31. Re: [Amps] DIN vs N (score: 1): Author: "Roger (sub1)" <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 12:46:02 -0400; For the average ham, there are only two considerations when it comes to N or DIN. Price and whether they are on the rig. Many VHF and UHF rigs have an N type chassis connector and the male N connecto; /archives//html/Amps/2011-04/msg00545.html (8,660 bytes)
32. Re: [Amps] DIN vs N (score: 1): Author: "Roger (sub1)" <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 16:28:58 -0400; I'm much more concerned as to how they are constructed and of what materials rather than where. That said, If I can get US made of comparable quality (IE good Silver plated Brass) then I go for the U; /archives//html/Amps/2011-04/msg00547.html (10,445 bytes)
33. Re: [Amps] DIN vs N (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 17:27:16 -0400; With all the money you have tied up in equipment why grouse (gee, I got a chance to use it right back, havent heard it in ages) about a couple of connectors? Carl KM1H _______________________________; /archives//html/Amps/2011-04/msg00550.html (11,695 bytes)
34. Re: [Amps] DIN vs N (score: 1): Author: "Roger (sub1)" <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 17:41:09 -0400; Who's grousing? <:-)) Only if there's so much slope in my shop floor I have to chase the work bench across the floor. Actually the slope "which was supposed to be out the front door" actually end up; /archives//html/Amps/2011-04/msg00551.html (12,241 bytes)
35. [Amps] DIN vs N (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 05:38:38 -0700; I'm much more concerned as to how they are constructed and of what materials rather than where. That said, If I can get US made of comparable quality (IE good Silver plated Brass) then I go for the U; /archives//html/Amps/2011-04/msg00557.html (12,735 bytes)
36. Re: [Amps] DIN vs N (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:39:39 -0400; ** A 1" long connector is such a small fraction of a wavelength that it doesnt register. As you get up into the high VHF frequencies it becomes a noticable line section of a different impedance. Wit; /archives//html/Amps/2011-04/msg00559.html (9,216 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 36
Page: [1] [2]