Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Dealing\s+with\s+the\s+manure\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Dealing\s+with\s+the\s+manure\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Dealing with the manure (score: 1): Author: nospam4me at juno.com (skipp isaham); Date: Thu Mar 20 02:36:38 2003; I was truly disappointed to read Rogers previous reply post to amps about the Palomar 300a Amp. - [paste] - Which of course is not accurate... I Emailed him direct to let him know the Palomar 300a Am; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00726.html (9,862 bytes)
2. [Amps] Dealing with the manure (score: 1): Author: n1rj at pivot.net (Roger D. Johnson); Date: Thu Mar 20 07:45:34 2003; It's obvious Mr "isaham" isn't. When caught in their deceptions, these CB types all resort to the tactic of attacking the person asking the questions. As I've said before, I'm a big boy and the ranti; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00729.html (7,400 bytes)
3. [Amps] Dealing with the manure (score: 1): Author: shr at medinaec.com (W0UN--John Brosnahan); Date: Thu Mar 20 09:53:32 2003; I am reluctant to jump into this discussion--but one point of clarification needs to be made because I think Roger has made ONE serious mistake. The mistake is to lump the illegal activities of "free; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00735.html (10,863 bytes)
4. [Amps] Dealing with the manure (score: 1): Author: shr at medinaec.com (W0UN--John Brosnahan); Date: Thu Mar 20 09:54:19 2003; I am reluctant to jump into this discussion--but one point of clarification needs to be made because I think Roger has made ONE serious mistake. The mistake is to lump the illegal activities of "free; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00736.html (10,854 bytes)
5. [Amps] Dealing with the manure (score: 1): Author: wmoorejr at cox.net (SteveM); Date: Thu Mar 20 10:37:23 2003; I know the 300a was built before 1978. I had a well used one 1977-81. It worked just fine on the bands from 10-40 meters with power out from 600+ to about 550 watts and was as clean as any other swee; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00737.html (8,368 bytes)
6. [Amps] Dealing with the manure (score: 1): Author: kd5 at watervalley.net (Benny); Date: Thu Mar 20 13:36:26 2003; W0UN. what happens to your theory when 8 of 10 freebanders sent notices this month were amateur licensees. per FCC,Amateur Enforcement QST April 2003 But you are right this is not the place for this; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00743.html (8,579 bytes)
7. [Amps] Dealing with the manure (score: 1): Author: gclute at attbi.com (G. Clute); Date: Thu Mar 20 23:51:35 2003; So that only proves the FCC knows where to send ham violation notices. Where would you send the CB violator notices? I suspect there are far more D.O.T. truckers in violation of operating in the CW p; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00749.html (7,665 bytes)
8. [Amps] Dealing with the manure (score: 1): Author: Dennis12Amplify at aol.com (Dennis12Amplify@aol.com); Date: Sat Mar 22 14:53:26 2003; Good reply Skipp! We have had our disagreements in the past, but I totally agree with you on this one. Regards, Dennis O. To: <amps@contesting.com>; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00772.html (11,930 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]