Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Decline\s+of\s+homebrewing\?\s*$/: 94 ]

Total 94 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [Amps] Decline of homebrewing? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 16:23:46 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Or maybe they are marveling at the quality and affordability of modern day equipment of all kinds. Let's hold a seance and find out. :-) 73, Bill W6WRT _
/archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00088.html (8,712 bytes)

22. Re: [Amps] Decline of homebrewing? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 16:40:39 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Why is everyone knocking the term "homebuilt dipole"? Try building a dipole that will withstand years and years of rain, ice, snow and hurricane force wi
/archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00089.html (9,251 bytes)

23. Re: [Amps] Decline of homebrewing? (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 10:49:08 -0600
Honestly? My 40 meter "Novice" First antenna Dipole, is still in the air. No Fancy Baluns, just RG-58 coax split at the center with porcelain insulators. Wire? Stranded 14 Ga house wire. Been radiati
/archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00090.html (10,126 bytes)

24. Re: [Amps] Decline of homebrewing? (score: 1)
Author: Bryan Swadener via Amps <amps@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 17:33:31 +0000 (UTC)
After many years of stretching, I bet the resonant frequency is lower. ;-) vy 73, Bryan WA7PRC -- My 40 meter "Novice" First antenna Dipole, is still in the air. No Fancy Baluns, just RG-58 coax spli
/archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00093.html (8,627 bytes)

25. Re: [Amps] Decline of homebrewing? (score: 1)
Author: "Fuqua, Bill L" <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 19:22:22 +0000
A little stretch makes little difference due to the low Q of a half-wave dipole antenna. 73 Bill wa4lav ________________________________________ From: Amps [amps-bounces@contesting.com] on behalf of
/archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00096.html (9,588 bytes)

26. Re: [Amps] Decline of homebrewing? (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 13:30:46 -0600
Yup, and even if it was a direct relation, for every inch of stretch, on 40 it would only go down 5 Kc. Joe WB9SBD Sig The Original Rolling Ball Clock Idle Tyme Idle-Tyme.com http://www.idle-tyme.com
/archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00097.html (10,036 bytes)

27. Re: [Amps] Decline of homebrewing? (score: 1)
Author: Bryan Swadener via Amps <amps@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 19:50:36 +0000 (UTC)
Humor apparently missed... by TWO. ;-) vy 73,Bryan WA7PRC Yup, and even if it was a direct relation, for every inch of stretch, on 40 it would only go down 5 Kc. Joe WB9SBD __________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00098.html (9,499 bytes)

28. Re: [Amps] Decline of homebrewing? (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 13:58:13 -0600
Well, thing is, I have heard the stories about stretching dipoles for 40+ years as being the gospel truth. so thought you may have been one of the believers. Joe WB9SBD Sig The Original Rolling Ball
/archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00099.html (10,512 bytes)

29. Re: [Amps] Decline of homebrewing? (score: 1)
Author: "Fuqua, Bill L" <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 20:11:15 +0000
No, it was not missed. I was playing the role of what they used to call the "straight man" in a comedy act that took things literally. So was my bit of humor missed as well? 73 Bill wa4lav __________
/archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00100.html (10,538 bytes)

30. Re: [Amps] Decline of homebrewing? (score: 1)
Author: S57AD <mirko.s57ad@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 21:17:50 +0100
Just leave that dipole outside stretching, maybe you will get dipole for 75M one day :D 73, Mirko, S57AD -- Mirko S57AD _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesti
/archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00101.html (10,646 bytes)

31. Re: [Amps] Decline of homebrewing? (score: 1)
Author: "Fuqua, Bill L" <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 20:49:37 +0000
There has been some discussion about homebrew dipoles not being true homebrewing. However, homebrewing starts some place. If the beginning of it is making and installing a dipole, that is a legitimat
/archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00102.html (10,266 bytes)

32. Re: [Amps] Decline of homebrewing? (score: 1)
Author: Bryan Swadener via Amps <amps@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 20:53:15 +0000 (UTC)
Now THAT's funny! Well played! ;-) vy 73, Bryan WA7PRC From: Mirko S57AD Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2017 12:17 PM Subject: Re: [Amps] Decline of homebrewing? Just leave that dipole outside stretching
/archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00103.html (10,018 bytes)

33. Re: [Amps] Decline of homebrewing? (score: 1)
Author: Bryan Swadener via Amps <amps@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 21:03:04 +0000 (UTC)
Whatever you say, Bill. Here's your clue that I'm kidding ==>  ;-) vy 73,Bryan WA7PRC From: "Fuqua, Bill L" <wlfuqu00@uky.edu> To: Bryan WA7PRC Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2017 12:11 PM Subject: RE: [
/archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00104.html (10,978 bytes)

34. Re: [Amps] Decline of homebrewing? (score: 1)
Author: Catherine James <catherine.james@att.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 21:05:43 +0000 (UTC)
73, Cathy N5WVR _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00105.html (9,144 bytes)

35. Re: [Amps] Decline of homebrewing? (score: 1)
Author: "Fuqua, Bill L" <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 21:11:11 +0000
We do sometimes take ourselves too seriously. 73 Bill wa4laav ________________________________________ From: Amps [amps-bounces@contesting.com] on behalf of Bryan Swadener via Amps [amps@contesting.c
/archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00106.html (11,342 bytes)

36. Re: [Amps] Decline of homebrewing? (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 16:47:13 -0600
If he's got this far without winning the Darwin award, then he may make out fine. But I'm also one of the minority in the US that still believes in the old fashioned principle that a person should be
/archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00111.html (9,728 bytes)

37. Re: [Amps] Decline of homebrewing? (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Bitterlich" <markbitterlich@embarqmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 20:21:19 -0500
In the days before these manufactured assemblies and dipoles were made and sold, EVERYONE "homebrewed" their feedlines and antennas. those SKs must be turning over in their graves. Bill Turner commen
/archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00113.html (11,189 bytes)

38. Re: [Amps] Decline of homebrewing? (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Bitterlich" <markbitterlich@embarqmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 20:28:09 -0500
BTW cables and wiring used in aircraft MUST be crimped. No soldering is allowed because of the high vibration environment. Bill Turner replied: Same with the marine environment. Absolutely not true
/archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00114.html (11,272 bytes)

39. Re: [Amps] Decline of homebrewing? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Wright <stevewrightnz@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 14:42:28 +1300
On 06/01/17 10:28, Catherine James <catherine.james@att.net> wrote: [...] I would be frightened if someone showed up on the list and wrote, "I've never built or repaired any electronic circuits befor
/archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00115.html (9,226 bytes)

40. Re: [Amps] Decline of homebrewing? (score: 1)
Author: Charles Farr <cefarr@hughes.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 17:56:02 -0800
Hey! I make my own beer.....doesn't that count for something? 73 Chuck, W6AJW On 01/05/2017 05:42 PM, Steve Wright wrote: On 06/01/17 10:28, Catherine James <catherine.james@att.net> wrote: [...] I w
/archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00116.html (9,497 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
This search system is powered by Namazu