Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Defibrulator\s+Caps\s+as\s+Filter\s+Caps\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Defibrulator\s+Caps\s+as\s+Filter\s+Caps\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Defibrulator Caps as Filter Caps (score: 1): Author: 2@mail.vcnet.com (Richard); Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 15:22:02 -0700; The worst scenario is that the cap. shorts and the CB opens the primary. To test ripple current handling ability, apply 60Hz at whatever V it takes to produce the expected ripple current, run it for; /archives//html/Amps/2002-07/msg00020.html (8,204 bytes)
2. [Amps] Defibrulator Caps as Filter Caps (score: 1): Author: vk3hz@wia.org.au (David Smith); Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 10:27:09 +1000; Turns out that this capacitor is from an HP defibrulator. There seems to be a question about whether a defib cap can handle continuous PSU filter duty. It may need to be derated. Any comments? Regard; /archives//html/Amps/2002-06/msg00276.html (8,126 bytes)
3. [Amps] Defibrulator Caps as Filter Caps (score: 1): Author: garyschafer@attbi.com (Gary Schafer); Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 22:52:30 -0400; Hi David, does. I can't remember by how much they should be de rated but I think it is in the order of 40% ?? You might check on of the capacitor manufacturers web sites. They may tell you there. 73; /archives//html/Amps/2002-06/msg00279.html (9,041 bytes)
4. [Amps] Defibrulator Caps as Filter Caps (score: 1): Author: wc6w@juno.com (Radio WC6W); Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 10:03:17 -0700; On Sun, 30 Jun 2002 10:27:09 +1000 "David Smith" <vk3hz@wia.org.au> writes: Hi David, Maxwell manufactures both pulse discharge and continuous rated filter capacitors. The type is usually marked on t; /archives//html/Amps/2002-06/msg00283.html (9,605 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]