Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Expert\s+2K\s+\/\s+lack\s+of\s+specs\s+\/\s+pragmatism\s+prevails\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Expert\s+2K\s+\/\s+lack\s+of\s+specs\s+\/\s+pragmatism\s+prevails\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Amps] Expert 2K / lack of specs / pragmatism prevails (score: 1): Author: "Leigh Turner" <invertech@frontierisp.net.au>; Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 11:18:18 +1030; Jim, I think some of these small footprint SS amps are just so compelling and attractive to hams, particularly the DX Expeditioners who lug them to remote locations, prospective purchasers rely more; /archives//html/Amps/2013-03/msg00070.html (9,803 bytes)
2. [Amps] Expert 2K / lack of specs / pragmatism prevails (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 06:19:07 -0700; When homebrewing big SS amps I've found designing 'em big and de-rating them a couple of dB below sat Po yields plenty adequate IMD performance for clean ham band SSB use. Certainly commensurate with; /archives//html/Amps/2013-03/msg00141.html (8,680 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Expert 2K / lack of specs / pragmatism prevails (score: 1): Author: "Leigh Turner" <invertech@frontierisp.net.au>; Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 12:36:07 +1030; Hi Jim, Yes, fully agree with your point ## 1 below. But, I'll happily trade a bit of efficiency in exchange for clean IMD anytime. Your point ## 2 was implied in my original comment; so we're again; /archives//html/Amps/2013-03/msg00156.html (10,685 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]