Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+FCC\s+\&\s+10\s+M\s+Amps\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+FCC\s+\&\s+10\s+M\s+Amps\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] FCC & 10 M Amps (score: 1): Author: "J. Leon Pringle, Jr and Audrey S. Pringle" <pringle50@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 09:05:34 -0600; I just read a post by n7IHY that makes me want to upchuck. If N7IHY or any others have an axe to grind with some bureaucrat or FCC employee way not deal directly one on one with that individual in li; /archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00337.html (7,200 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] FCC & 10 M Amps (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>; Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 07:31:15 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ N7IHY's comments are perfectly valid and do not diminish the "image of Amateur Radio". The only image I see tarnished is that of th; /archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00338.html (7,674 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] FCC & 10 M Amps (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 08:52:28 -0800; On Feb 18, 2006, at 7:05 AM, J. Leon Pringle, Jr and Audrey S. Pringle wrote: Heavy handed censoring could easily launch the beginning of an exodus from this group. Richard L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386; /archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00342.html (8,100 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] FCC & 10 M Amps (score: 1): Author: "Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>; Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 11:53:23 -0500; OK folks ... The FCC & 10 M Amps and Tokyo HP topics are now closed. Amplifiers for use in other services are off limits on this list except as they illustrate good construction and design techniques; /archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00343.html (7,980 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]