- 21. Re: [Amps] Flex Power Genius XL 2KW amplifier (score: 1)
- Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 08:55:44 -0400
- "Personally I use full QSK less than 10% of the time, but I would want a QSK-capable amp even if I never used it." Fast switching speed isn't only for CW operation. AMTOR, what may now be an obsolet
- /archives//html/Amps/2018-10/msg00060.html (10,922 bytes)
- 22. Re: [Amps] Flex Power Genius XL 2KW amplifier (score: 1)
- Author: Ron Youvan <ka4inm@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 09:34:19 -0400
- It would be interesting to d a study and see just how many CW op's actually work QSK. I've been on CW since '54 and have never used it (except back in my CW traffic days with a separate antenna on t
- /archives//html/Amps/2018-10/msg00061.html (10,904 bytes)
- 23. Re: [Amps] Flex Power Genius XL 2KW amplifier (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Garland <4cx250b@miamioh.edu>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 17:36:15 -0600
- I agree mostly with Victor's comments, but would like to expound on a couple things about QSK and semi-QSK which appear to cause confusion. (1) Most modern transceivers have provisions for delaying R
- /archives//html/Amps/2018-10/msg00065.html (12,569 bytes)
- 24. Re: [Amps] Flex Power Genius XL 2KW amplifier (score: 1)
- Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
- Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 13:22:10 -0400
- W8ZR: >"With respect to the Flex Power Genius XL, it's not clear that the T/R relays are sequenced properly for CW operation. The company hasn't published any circuit diagram of the amplifier yet..."
- /archives//html/Amps/2018-10/msg00068.html (10,813 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu