Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Future\s+of\s+RF\s+AMPS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Future\s+of\s+RF\s+AMPS\s*$/: 35 ]

Total 35 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [Amps] Future of RF AMPS (score: 1): Author: <dsolberg@wi.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 20:20:40 +0000; They don't make these combiners they buy them RF Power Systems http://www.rfpowersystems.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=80 They make custom transformers and combiners, so I am sure; /archives//html/Amps/2013-09/msg00045.html (16,493 bytes)
22. Re: [Amps] Future of RF AMPS (score: 1): Author: Geert Jan de Groot <pe1hzg@xs4all.nl>; Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 23:10:24 +0200; I would also look at other devices. For instance, NXP produces a number of devices (like the BLF578XRS) where a single device produces up to 1400 watts, up to 500 MHz. The selling factor is that the; /archives//html/Amps/2013-09/msg00048.html (8,592 bytes)
23. Re: [Amps] Future of RF AMPS (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 17:29:54 -0400; It's probably easier to build a broadband Wilkinson divider and combiner as used in the Quadra. 73, ... Joe, W4TV They make custom transformers and combiners, so I am sure they could make a 2 port co; /archives//html/Amps/2013-09/msg00050.html (15,446 bytes)
24. Re: [Amps] Future of RF AMPS (score: 1): Author: Manfred Mornhinweg <manfred@ludens.cl>; Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 22:36:45 +0000; Geert, I would also look at other devices. For instance, NXP produces a number of devices (like the BLF578XRS) where a single device produces up to 1400 watts, up to 500 MHz. I would absolutely love; /archives//html/Amps/2013-09/msg00052.html (12,533 bytes)
25. Re: [Amps] Future of RF AMPS (score: 1): Author: Gary K9GS <garyk9gs@wi.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 22:24:26 -0500; Here ya go: http://www.acom-bg.com/amplifiers3x2000.html There was a picture floating around a few months ago showing an Italian ham that had a special high power version of this combiner. He was usi; /archives//html/Amps/2013-09/msg00059.html (14,235 bytes)
26. [Amps] Future of RF AMPS (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 01:39:57 -0700; Geert, I would absolutely love to have a few of these to play with - but I would certainly not attempt to build a legal limit HF amplifier using just one of them! Cooling them at that level is an imp; /archives//html/Amps/2013-09/msg00105.html (10,988 bytes)
27. Re: [Amps] Future of RF AMPS (score: 1): Author: Richard Solomon <dickw1ksz@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 08:16:23 -0700; M2 markets both a 6 and 2 Meter Monoband Amp, 1250 watts out, uses a single device. Granted there's a time limit on AM and JT modes, but there are no limits on SSB. cooling for an HF model. Look at t; /archives//html/Amps/2013-09/msg00121.html (13,722 bytes)
28. Re: [Amps] Future of RF AMPS (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 11:48:43 -0400; 1200 watts with those services in fine in saturated single carrier modes (FM, CW, FSK, JT65/JT9) but will be an IMD nightmare in linear operation (SSB). I doubt those devices will be clean above 800W; /archives//html/Amps/2013-09/msg00125.html (13,976 bytes)
29. Re: [Amps] Future of RF AMPS (score: 1): Author: Manfred Mornhinweg <manfred@ludens.cl>; Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 19:14:14 +0000; Jim, manages to get 800w to 1 kw out of just one device. I saw on U tube, 1 of em being used in a 1250w CCS FM broadcast TX, 88-108 mhz variety. That's in saturated service. Dissipation should be no; /archives//html/Amps/2013-09/msg00135.html (19,872 bytes)
30. Re: [Amps] Future of RF AMPS (score: 1): Author: Richard Solomon <dickw1ksz@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 10:04:03 -0700; I have to believe that M2 knows what they are doing with these Amps. They offer a 12 month limited warranty on them. If it's such a poor design, they will be replacing a lot of them. but, I doubt tha; /archives//html/Amps/2013-09/msg00163.html (20,539 bytes)
31. [Amps] Future of RF AMPS (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 19:50:26 -0700; And may I ask what's the connection between +69dBm and ham radio? Phew! Manfred puritans, do-gooders .... and pundits. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contestin; /archives//html/Amps/2013-09/msg00176.html (7,988 bytes)
32. Re: [Amps] Future of RF AMPS (score: 1): Author: Manfred Mornhinweg <manfred@ludens.cl>; Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:39:11 +0000; Dick, I have to believe that M2 knows what they are doing with these Amps. They offer a 12 month limited warranty on them. I really hope so! I know nobody who owns one of those amps and uses it inten; /archives//html/Amps/2013-09/msg00200.html (12,793 bytes)
33. Re: [Amps] Future of RF AMPS (score: 1): Author: Richard Solomon <dickw1ksz@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 11:58:33 -0700; There are some review(s) on M2 and Bekko SS Amps on e-Ham, not many but a start. Most of the "design" faults you mention were do to unforseen circumstances, not by ignoring proper design procedures;; /archives//html/Amps/2013-09/msg00201.html (14,572 bytes)
34. Re: [Amps] Future of RF AMPS (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:18:10 -0400; I have to believe that M2 knows what they are doing with these Amps. They offer a 12 month limited warranty on them. So where do I find out about this amp. I never heard of M12. Force 12 and M^2, bu; /archives//html/Amps/2013-09/msg00204.html (8,468 bytes)
35. Re: [Amps] Future of RF AMPS (score: 1): Author: Russ Williams <hrd998cc@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 22:11:32 -0700 (PDT); Yes, M Squared has a complete amp for sale. Here is a link to a 2 meter amp using this device. Quite an impressive device that will withstand very high SWR. http://www.qsl.net/f1jrd/MRFE6VP61K25H.; /archives//html/Amps/2013-09/msg00207.html (9,306 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 35
Page: [1] [2]