Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Fw\:\s+How\s+about\s+this\s+furnace\?\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Fw: How about this furnace? (score: 1)
Author: "N7HIY" <N7HIY@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2006 03:53:07 -0800
i see 3 band switch taps on the 1/2" copper tubing coil, tapped toroid is behind band switch for 10 grand one could hear it on 11 meters who said there is an FCC that is still competent to measure RF
/archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00005.html (8,534 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] Fw: How about this furnace? (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2006 13:32:49 +0100
There is another tapped coil made of tube visible. One complete winding to move from 10 to 11m is too large with that tube and its high output capacity. The taps on the coil above the tube are for 10
/archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00006.html (9,968 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] Fw: How about this furnace? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2006 07:02:07 -0600
You may be jumping to an erroneous conclusion- the band switch shows 5 bands, and is set on 15m; he signs as an Extra, from Mississippi, and says he operates mostly on 80. I, also have questions, lik
/archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00007.html (9,998 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] Fw: How about this furnace? (score: 1)
Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2006 10:00:57 -0500
If I had that thing I wouldn't leave the house for a month. I could give up food and water for that kind of gain. ;-) _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting
/archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00009.html (7,410 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] Fw: How about this furnace? (score: 1)
Author: "Artmouton" <k5fnq@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2006 09:19:41 -0600
The why is probably the same reason those Yahoos buy the big pick em up trucks, raise them to nose bleed heights, put on large tires, big fenders and at least one, if not two, winches (or is that, we
/archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00010.html (12,167 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] Fw: How about this furnace? (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Sawyer" <w3slk@uplink.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2006 10:19:43 -0500
You have better eyes than me Cliff. I copied the picture over to MS Picture It! and attempted to blow it up. What I found was that the taps off of the coil go to the bandswitch. I couldn't find any s
/archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00011.html (10,764 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] Fw: How about this furnace? (score: 1)
Author: "k0dan" <k0dan@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2006 13:47:06 -0600
Aw, you guys are too cruel...they just like to run the finals "conseravtive" and not work 'em too hard! All legal limit (wink wink say no more, say no more...) 73 dt k0dan is 8940006QQcategoryZ4671QQ
/archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00014.html (13,470 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] Fw: How about this furnace? (score: 1)
Author: "Sam W4OAE" <w4oae@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2006 16:21:12 -0500
A closer look yields.................................... The band switch is set to 80 meters. Look for the white mark on the bandswitch knob. It's pointing to 80m. The exciter/driver is clearly shown
/archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00016.html (8,391 bytes)

9. [Amps] FW: How about this furnace? (score: 1)
Author: "Larry N. Carman" <lncarman@swbell.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 13:54:38 -0600
I think Texas ( TCU )KWH increase was 44% last year compared to 22% for all other states. TCU used the excuse that most their power was generated using natural gas which had a substantial increase in
/archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00155.html (9,464 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu