Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+GU\s+74\s+operating\s+parameters\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+GU\s+74\s+operating\s+parameters\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] GU 74 operating parameters (score: 1): Author: Ulf Tjerneld <star@frizon.org>; Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 19:26:34 +0100; Hi all, I'm building my first amplifier - or my first serious amplifier that is. The chosen tube is a GU74B and I'm wondering about the operating parameters when I'm designing the Pi-L filter. I have; /archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00027.html (7,616 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] GU 74 operating parameters (score: 1): Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <K6LL@ARRL.net>; Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 10:50:40 -0800; I run a PAIR of GU-74B's. At 1500W output, for the PAIR: Ep = 2700 V Ip = 1 A Is = 30 ma Dave Hachadorian, K6LL Yuma, AZ _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contest; /archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00029.html (8,582 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] GU 74 operating parameters (score: 1): Author: Karl-Arne Markström <sm0aom@telia.com>; Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 19:56:03 +0100; First, the quoted limits apply to the 4CX800, for the Russian GU74B they are 2000V and 0,5 A respectively. Assuming you will "get away" with the 4CX800 ratings, the plate voltage swing will be limite; /archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00030.html (9,170 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] GU 74 operating parameters (score: 1): Author: "Jim Tonne" <tonne@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 14:09:47 -0500; Karl-Arne wrote in part: Current in the PI and the L inductors will be similar unless network Q is high. Get PI-L designer here: http://tonnesoftware.com/piel.html Not only does design but also analy; /archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00031.html (8,075 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] GU 74 operating parameters (score: 1): Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>; Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 23:19:58 +0100; Who manufactures a 4CX800? Is that not a pseudo designation of the GU74b, as they do with the GU43b which the Russian dealers advertise as a 4CX1000? OR the GI23b as a 4CX1600? My calculations for cl; /archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00036.html (10,110 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] GU 74 operating parameters (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 19:39:43 -0500; Svetlana marketed the GU-74b as the 4CX800A and changed the specs to increase power as well as set a very high idle current to obtain barely acceptable IMD. Carl KM1H Who manufactures a 4CX800? Is th; /archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00037.html (10,839 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] GU 74 operating parameters (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 17:32:00 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: There seems to be some confusion as to what specs apply. According to http://frank.pocnet.net/sheets/018/g/GU74B.pdf The max anode current is .75 A, not .5. In any event, the; /archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00038.html (8,377 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] GU 74 operating parameters (score: 1): Author: Ulf Tjerneld <star@frizon.org>; Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 15:35:04 +0100; Yet there are many commercial amp manufacturers, Acom among them, running GU74 on a plate voltage well above 2500 volts and at the same time claiming a 1 KW output. That means they are really exceedi; /archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00043.html (8,955 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]