Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+HELP\s+Modifications\s+for\s+a\s+Kenwood\s+TL922\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] HELP Modifications for a Kenwood TL922 (score: 1)
Author: "BEHIELS JEAN-PIERRE" <ON4AEF@base.be>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:03:06 +0100
Dr; I have from the scrap and in repair a old Kenwood TL922 amplifier. I will do some demonstration and technical test for a school educational = object in electronics. But I only have obtained one o
/archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00346.html (7,924 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] HELP Modifications for a Kenwood TL922 (score: 1)
Author: MIKE DURKIN <patriot121@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 11:23:36 -0800
Pair of 3-500z output - well lets say 1000W into 50Ohm. with only one 3-500 its 1/2 ... so you have 500W into 50Ohm The impeadence of the plate at 500W is basically double that of 1000W. In turn chan
/archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00348.html (9,044 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] HELP Modifications for a Kenwood TL922 (score: 1)
Author: Colin Lamb <k7fm@teleport.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 11:50:41 -0800 (GMT-08:00)
Hello Jean: I see the problem as follows: You got an amp that uses two 3-500 tubes, but you only got one 3-500 tube. An additional 3-500 tube would cost more than the amplifier and you want a cheap s
/archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00351.html (7,817 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] HELP Modifications for a Kenwood TL922 (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:21:29 -0500
A. A new 3-500Z costs around $150 B. The grids are not grounded in a TL-922. C. I dont think there is top clearance for a 4-400 Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ Amps mailing
/archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00355.html (8,727 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] HELP Modifications for a Kenwood TL922 (score: 1)
Author: Colin Lamb <k7fm@teleport.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:20:24 -0800 (GMT-08:00)
"A. A new 3-500Z costs around $150 B. The grids are not grounded in a TL-922. C. I dont think there is top clearance for a 4-400" The ham raising the question was not in the US and tubes may be more
/archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00356.html (8,610 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] HELP Modifications for a Kenwood TL922 (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:47:58 -0500
Belgium is not a 3rd world pit! Distributors are in Europe or one could be shipped from the USA for about $15. As long as it is realized; its not a direct swap otherwise. About .3" taller than the cu
/archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00358.html (9,324 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] HELP Modifications for a Kenwood TL922 (score: 1)
Author: <on4aef@base.be>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 04:12:21 +0100
It is not a question of money or to put some other types of tubes. It is a question of using only one 3-500Z in this amplifier and what I have to change to realise this not more ! Of course I have to
/archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00363.html (10,035 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] HELP Modifications for a Kenwood TL922 (score: 1)
Author: <on4aef@base.be>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 04:13:26 +0100
It is not a question of money or to put some other types of tubes. It is a question of using only one 3-500Z in this amplifier and what I have to change to realise this not more ! Of course I have to
/archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00364.html (9,116 bytes)

9. Re: [Amps] HELP Modifications for a Kenwood TL922 (score: 1)
Author: "k7fm" <k7fm@teleport.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:03:51 -0800
Hello Jean: I do not have a TL-922 and have only briefly looked at the schematic, so these are just my thoughts to consider. 1. The filament transformer in the 922 is a combination unit that also pro
/archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00371.html (9,547 bytes)

10. Re: [Amps] HELP Modifications for a Kenwood TL922 (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:40:50 -0500
Understood now. One problem that needs to be resolved is the input network. I dont believe there is sufficient tuning range for the driving impedance of one tube. Why do you want to run only one tube
/archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00375.html (11,231 bytes)

11. Re: [Amps] HELP Modifications for a Kenwood TL922 (score: 1)
Author: Ron Youvan <ka4inm@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 09:09:13 -0500
/*snip*/ You do NOT have to change the transformer! You could replace the missing "tube filament" with a resistor, a good calculation and example of Ohms law. -- Ron KA4INM - I'm proud to be Chuck's
/archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00378.html (8,614 bytes)

12. Re: [Amps] HELP Modifications for a Kenwood TL922 (score: 1)
Author: Alek Petkovic <vk6apk@bigpond.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 06:52:02 +0800
Download the manuals of the AL80B and the AL82 from the Ameritron site and compare the input and output circuit values and/or part numbers. There may be some clues there. Apart from that, it seems to
/archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00390.html (10,907 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu