Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+HT\-33A\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+HT\-33A\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] HT-33A (score: 1): Author: "Phil LaMarche" <plamarc1@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:52:55 -0400; Would anyone share with me the going cost for a HT33A amplifier? Want to quote on one but haven't seen any pricing in years. Even an educated guess. Please. Phil Philip LaMarche LaMarche Enterprises,; /archives//html/Amps/2009-07/msg00324.html (6,636 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] HT-33A (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 12:13:28 -0400; With a perfect tube and maybe a spare its $400 and up depending on cosmetics. Figure $200-300 tops with a bad tube. OTOH, newly minted HF no coders without a clue will pay stupid amounts of money on; /archives//html/Amps/2009-07/msg00325.html (8,038 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] HT-33A (score: 1): Author: Charles Harpole <k4vud@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 02:33:53 +0000; I'd say $300 for users and $800 to collectors. Problem with all old rigs are old caps. Best idea is just change them all out at once and relax. My Ten Tec Titan I power supply has cap problems, I cha; /archives//html/Amps/2009-07/msg00330.html (8,776 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] HT-33A (score: 1): Author: "Paul Kraemer" <elespe@lisco.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 21:52:01 -0500; Why do we seem to have a double standard on these things? One price for buying and a much higer one for selling? Maybe our critics are correct. Paul K0UYA ____________________________________________; /archives//html/Amps/2009-07/msg00331.html (9,770 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] HT-33A (score: 1): Author: Colin Lamb <k7fm@teleport.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 20:08:47 -0700 (GMT-07:00); I think the comment was directed at condition. A higher price for those that look pretty. Same thing with cars. A driver is much less than a looker. Also, as I recall, the HT-33 uses a nice oil fille; /archives//html/Amps/2009-07/msg00332.html (7,454 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] HT-33A (score: 1): Author: "David C. Hallam" <dhallam@rapidsys.com>; Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 08:22:37 -0400; The problem with the HT-33A is the tube. PL-172's have a propensity to leak. Since they are no longer being made, a good one is difficult to find and expensive when you do. A good PL-172 is probably; /archives//html/Amps/2009-07/msg00333.html (8,500 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] HT-33A (score: 1): Author: Glen Zook <gzook@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 08:11:41 -0700 (PDT); One thing is with the circuitry of the HT-33A. Some of the later units actually had HT-33B circuitry. The HT-33A that I obtained a few months ago is definitely marked as an HT-33A. However, it came f; /archives//html/Amps/2009-07/msg00403.html (8,064 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] HT-33A (score: 1): Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:47:27 -0400; I know this is a revival of an old topic, but I thought it worth mentioning. Also, please keep the CCs to a minimum as this one disappeared into the moderators well due to too many recipients. Surpri; /archives//html/Amps/2009-07/msg00444.html (12,275 bytes)
9. Re: [Amps] HT-33A (score: 1): Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:08:39 -0400; Surprising is all of the HT-33As I've seen had the holes punched for the additional VR tubes, but no tubes. The entire amp is easy to recondition unless it has corrosion on the chassis. There really; /archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00060.html (11,465 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]