Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Ham\s+Tests\,\s+was\s+Price\s+per\s+Watt\s+Conversation\s*$/: 46 ]

Total 46 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [Amps] Ham Tests, was Price per Watt Conversation (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 03:03:33 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: OK, I should have said only one ship listening close enough to help the survivors. As I recall, other ships eventually came but too late. Is that better?
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00359.html (10,913 bytes)

22. Re: [Amps] Ham Tests, was Price per Watt Conversation (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 03:17:17 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Further proof that time marches on. JT65, good as it is, has been overtaken by JT9, which uses about a tenth the bandwidth and according to the author is
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00360.html (10,923 bytes)

23. Re: [Amps] Ham Tests, was Price per Watt Conversation (score: 1)
Author: mark bitterlich <markbitterlich@embarqmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 23:48:55 -0400
Here it is:  The op used Morse because radio voice equipment hadn't been installed on the Titanic. This was the era of spark, remember. As I speculated, if good voice equipment was available, I'm sur
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00364.html (7,501 bytes)

24. Re: [Amps] Ham Tests, was Price per Watt Conversation (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Bitterlich" <markbitterlich@embarqmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 00:58:46 -0400
Bill, I did not miss the point, I just think you're wrong. Please do not assume that the two things are synonymous. In an emergency a level headed person will use the training he or she has received
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00365.html (14,942 bytes)

25. Re: [Amps] Ham Tests, was Price per Watt Conversation (score: 1)
Author: Thomas Walsh <w2co@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 07:37:27 -0600
This is mostly because of the "removal of the code testing requirements, and the dumbing down of the written tests" for an amateur radio license has left the flood gates open to anyone who can memori
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00372.html (15,545 bytes)

26. Re: [Amps] Ham Tests, was Price per Watt Conversation (score: 1)
Author: Glen Zook via Amps <amps@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 14:37:00 +0000 (UTC)
The problem with the computer modes is that they require a computer in addition to the radio.  Glen, K9STH  Website: http://k9sth.net REPLY: Further proof that time marches on. JT65, good as it is, h
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00374.html (11,411 bytes)

27. Re: [Amps] Ham Tests, was Price per Watt Conversation (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 15:35:10 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: That's not emergency communication. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.con
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00376.html (10,755 bytes)

28. Re: [Amps] Ham Tests, was Price per Watt Conversation (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 16:19:37 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Mark, why not talk to the real professionals about emergency communication? The people who do it every day. Go down to your local fire or police departme
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00379.html (10,957 bytes)

29. Re: [Amps] Ham Tests, was Price per Watt Conversation (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 16:20:14 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: I'm not suggesting the new digital modes for emergency, just pointing out that times do change. IMO, voice is still the best in a real life and death sit
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00380.html (10,857 bytes)

30. Re: [Amps] Ham Tests, was Price per Watt Conversation (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.qozzy.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 21:11:51 -0400
You might be going on 76 Jim but when you cant stay on subject I begin to wonder. Im going on 77 and knew the subject was about emergency comms, not daydreaming in the home ham shack. Carl I've prima
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00404.html (14,840 bytes)

31. Re: [Amps] Ham Tests, was Price per Watt Conversation (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 18:36:01 -0700
If the conversation was about EmComm, then why wasn't that listed on the Subject Line? :) And how did we get to EmComm from Price per Watt Conversation? And from there to a religious discussion of th
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00407.html (13,309 bytes)

32. Re: [Amps] Ham Tests, was Price per Watt Conversation (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 02:06:08 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: I wouldn't worry too much about transistors becoming unobtainable because equivalents will nearly always be available. Compared to tubes, transistors don
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00409.html (11,089 bytes)

33. Re: [Amps] Ham Tests, was Price per Watt Conversation (score: 1)
Author: <w8hw@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 22:09:19 -0400
Jim, I am NOT trying to deny reality by saying the CW bands are hopping, I do hear them. Admit it, you have NEVER BEEN AT MY STATION TO KNOW different, that clearly demonstrates that you are in denia
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00410.html (14,104 bytes)

34. Re: [Amps] Ham Tests, was Price per Watt Conversation (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 02:27:19 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: "Hopping" is clearly subjective but I have to agree the CW bands do not usually "hop". It's a dying skill but it still has a way to go. 73, Bill W6WRT __
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00412.html (10,515 bytes)

35. [Amps] Ham Tests, was Price per Watt Conversation (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 20:07:52 -0700
REPLY <I wouldn't worry too much about transistors becoming unobtainable <because equivalents will nearly always be available. Compared to <tubes, transistors don't have nearly as many physical varia
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00413.html (11,344 bytes)

36. Re: [Amps] Ham Tests, was Price per Watt Conversation (score: 1)
Author: Ken K6MR <k6mr@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 03:22:06 +0000
It's a dying skill but it still has a way to go. Yes, but no other mode can offer the fun factor of cw. Ive never been very good at it, but the idea of A Boy and his Radio (copyright K0HB) is what ke
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00414.html (11,751 bytes)

37. Re: [Amps] Ham Tests, was Price per Watt Conversation (score: 1)
Author: donroden@hiwaay.net
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 22:25:27 -0500
Is EMTRON out of business ? Don W4DNR DonR _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00415.html (7,638 bytes)

38. Re: [Amps] Ham Tests, was Price per Watt Conversation (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 04:56:46 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: My point exactly, replacement variations will be available for a long time. I do agree about certain parts like CPUs. If you can't get the original you a
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00422.html (8,128 bytes)

39. [Amps] Ham Tests, was Price per Watt Conversation (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 22:10:39 -0700
<Jim, I am NOT trying to deny reality by saying the CW bands are hopping, I <do hear them. Admit it, you have NEVER BEEN AT MY STATION TO KNOW different, <that clearly demonstrates that you are in de
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00426.html (8,435 bytes)

40. Re: [Amps] Ham Tests, was Price per Watt Conversation (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 08:56:34 +0200
MRF458 and MRF 454 transistors are still available and you can also use 2SC2879. 73 Peter, DJ7WW <I wouldn't worry too much about transistors becoming unobtainable <because equivalents will nearly al
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00429.html (8,613 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu