Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Heathkit\s+SB\-1000\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Heathkit\s+SB\-1000\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Heathkit SB-1000 (score: 1): Author: ko4nrbs@yahoo.com (Bill Smith); Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 07:28:22 -0800 (PST); What's one if these amps worth in excellent condition? Are they worth the trouble? 73, Bill == Bill Smith KO4NR __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Try FREE Yahoo! Mail; /archives//html/Amps/2002-03/msg00234.html (6,725 bytes)
2. [Amps] Heathkit SB-1000 (score: 1): Author: rakefet@rakefet.com (Vic Rosenthal); Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 08:19:04 -0800; I sold mine recently for $450. It will deliver around 800w CW, 1000w PEP SSB on all bands from 160-10 meters, if you replace the plate RF choke with an Ameritron AL80B unit to eliminate a resonance n; /archives//html/Amps/2002-03/msg00236.html (7,008 bytes)
3. [Amps] Heathkit SB-1000 (score: 1): Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (WYsixK); Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 08:45:57 -0800 (PST); How was this amp different than the SB220 and why did Heathkit make it? __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! http:; /archives//html/Amps/2002-03/msg00240.html (7,793 bytes)
4. [Amps] Heathkit SB-1000 (score: 1): Author: rakefet@rakefet.com (Vic Rosenthal); Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 11:18:22 -0800; It has a single 3-500Z instead of a pair. It also covers 160 meters, which the SB-220 did not. You will have to ask their (retired, I guess) marketing dept. why they made it! 73, Vic, K2VCO Fresno CA; /archives//html/Amps/2002-03/msg00245.html (6,751 bytes)
5. [AMPS] Heathkit SB-1000 (score: 1): Author: jwatson@mail.cde.com (John Watson); Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 09:50:03 -0500; I have a SB-1000 that I recently bought. It has all of the paperwork, etc. I have used it a total of 2 to 3 hours maximum. I have read here that the 3-500Z's are supposed to be no longer made by Eima; /archives//html/Amps/1997-03/msg00268.html (7,990 bytes)
6. [AMPS] Heathkit SB-1000 (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Thu, 27 Mar 97 08:47:55 -0800; Eimac sold their glass tube division to General Electric. 1. Faster T/R switching so that it will not hot switch with some of the newer radios. 2. Better VHF supprssion so that it will not arc its b; /archives//html/Amps/1997-03/msg00269.html (9,075 bytes)
7. [AMPS] Heathkit SB-1000 (score: 1): Author: w8jitom@worldnet.att.net (Tom Rauch (W8JI)); Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 14:29:47 -0500; Eimac sold the glass tube designs to Triton, a former ITT tube manufacturing plant in Pennsylvania. Triton is already producing 3-500Z tubes. Contrary to rumors started by one person, VHF parasitics; /archives//html/Amps/1997-03/msg00271.html (10,326 bytes)
8. [AMPS] Heathkit SB-1000 (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Thu, 27 Mar 97 16:17:57 -0800; To see some photos of bandswitches that were almost certainly........,:: http://www.vcnet.com/measures According to the photographs of toasted AL80 bandswitches, the 160 m padder contacts on AL-80 b; /archives//html/Amps/1997-03/msg00273.html (12,812 bytes)
9. [AMPS] Heathkit SB-1000 (score: 1): Author: w8jitom@worldnet.att.net (Tom Rauch (W8JI)); Date: Fri, 28 Mar 1997 01:27:15 -0500; Hi Rich, Peak anode current is not "three times the indicated current" in a class AB PA. A Chaffe analysis must be done, since the current waveshape is made complex by the less than 360 degree conduc; /archives//html/Amps/1997-03/msg00275.html (10,869 bytes)
10. [AMPS] Heathkit SB-1000 (score: 1): Author: w8jitom@worldnet.att.net (Tom Rauch (W8JI)); Date: Fri, 28 Mar 1997 03:14:32 -0500; I got in a rush to reply, and started doing an AC analysis of dc tube currents. That part was OK, but tonight's post was a mess. Scratch all that. Peak instantaneous current actually ranges from two; /archives//html/Amps/1997-03/msg00276.html (9,765 bytes)
11. [AMPS] Heathkit SB-1000 (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Fri, 28 Mar 97 06:38:41 -0800; ...snip... good night, Tom ...snip.. When a constant-current curve bends substantively, the tube is in downtown Saturationville. On curve #4264, any novice can see that the 1.4a and 1.6a peak-I curv; /archives//html/Amps/1997-03/msg00278.html (9,767 bytes)
12. [AMPS] Heathkit SB-1000 (score: 1): Author: rfp@rfparts.com (Merit W6NQ); Date: Fri, 28 Mar 1997 07:57:03 -0800; A few comments to clear up confusion on the manufacturing status of 3-500Z & 3-500ZG tubes. As generally known by now, Eimac no longer produces glass transmitting tubes. TRITON purchased the manufact; /archives//html/Amps/1997-03/msg00283.html (11,148 bytes)
13. [AMPS] Heathkit SB-1000 (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Fri, 28 Mar 1997 13:26:20 EST; SNIP That is a very generous statement which translates into English as FRAUD. Once is an error, twice is a coincidence, etc............... I have to disagree a bit with the above. The standard Eimac; /archives//html/Amps/1997-03/msg00284.html (13,345 bytes)
14. [AMPS] Heathkit SB-1000 (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Fri, 28 Mar 97 11:03:42 -0800; Lots of other people believed QST's "6 Respondants" (Telewski, Rauch, Brandon, et cetera) in the 9/94 issue simply because QST has remnant-credibility from the days when George Grammer, W1DF, and a f; /archives//html/Amps/1997-03/msg00285.html (10,126 bytes)
15. [AMPS] Heathkit SB-1000 (score: 1): Author: bcotter@pop.uky.edu (Bill Cotter); Date: Fri, 28 Mar 1997 18:02:27 -0500; Richard, Please consider taking the attacks on others offline. If you have something personal against Tom, perhaps you should discuss it with him, if he is interested. The ax-grinding only serves to; /archives//html/Amps/1997-03/msg00290.html (11,459 bytes)
16. [AMPS] Heathkit SB-1000 (score: 1): Author: pgerba@pgerba (peter gerba); Date: Fri, 28 Mar 1997 15:44:26 -0800 (PST); sour grapes Rich..? pete, kn6bi Peter Gerba pgerba@crl.com -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com P; /archives//html/Amps/1997-03/msg00296.html (7,935 bytes)
17. [AMPS] Heathkit SB-1000 (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Sat, 29 Mar 97 11:10:12 -0800; I did not purchase an SB-1000 or an AL-80, Peter--so what's to be sour about? OTOH, if I had, the odds are not great that the output bandswitch would have arced from intermittent, unterminated 160MH; /archives//html/Amps/1997-03/msg00305.html (8,299 bytes)
18. [AMPS] Heathkit SB-1000 (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Sat, 29 Mar 97 11:11:04 -0800; yes Chortle. I received an eyebrow-raisin' clip from one of his posts from an unfan, which is why I showed up here. Where there's smoke, there's................. Better suppressors is not going to h; /archives//html/Amps/1997-03/msg00308.html (9,811 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]