Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Here\'s\s+a\s+new\s+one\s+for\s+me\s+that\s+I\'d\s+like\s+to\s+share\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Here's a new one for me that I'd like to share (score: 1)
Author: "w2cqm@juno.com" <w2cqm@juno.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 17:48:25 GMT
After some preliminary tests, I decided that a dual 8877 hombrew amplifier project would not be cooled adequately with a previously installed low RPM tandem blower. Checked the "junk box" for another
/archives//html/Amps/2017-12/msg00030.html (9,075 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] Here's a new one for me that I'd like to share (score: 1)
Author: "Jim W7RY" <jimw7ry@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 12:07:46 -0600
A vacuum cleaner motor also speeds up when you plug the suction or the discharge. That's the nature of a blower. Remove the load (moving air) and it speeds up. 73 Jim W7RY --Original Message-- From:
/archives//html/Amps/2017-12/msg00031.html (10,728 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] Here's a new one for me that I'd like to share (score: 1)
Author: Paul Baldock <paul@paulbaldock.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 12:45:49 -0800
It seems counter intuitive, bit what Jim say's is true, block the blower and it does not have to move the air so is doing "less work". You can demonstrate this by monitoring the current on the vacuum
/archives//html/Amps/2017-12/msg00033.html (11,294 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu