Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+ICOM\s+756\s+PRO\s+II\s+or\s+FT\s+1000\s+MP\s+Field\s+or\s+Mk\s+5\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+ICOM\s+756\s+PRO\s+II\s+or\s+FT\s+1000\s+MP\s+Field\s+or\s+Mk\s+5\s+\?\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] ICOM 756 PRO II or FT 1000 MP Field or Mk 5 ? (score: 1): Author: oes@npartners.se (Kenneth Nilsson); Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 23:44:36 +0100; Hello out there! Considering to exchange my IC-765 for a more modern rig. Four of my local friends have bought the new Yeasu FT 1000 MP Field and are very impressed. As an ICOM-man since years back a; /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00255.html (8,292 bytes)
2. [Amps] ICOM 756 PRO II or FT 1000 MP Field or Mk 5 ? (score: 1): Author: DF3KV@aol.com (DF3KV@aol.com); Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 18:44:19 EST; I l Hi Ken, What rigs have your friends used before the FT1000MP Field to become impressed? If I were you, I would by another IC-765. That gives you dual receive and SO2R capabilities,=20 alternative; /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00256.html (8,951 bytes)
3. [Amps] ICOM 756 PRO II or FT 1000 MP Field or Mk 5 ? (score: 1): Author: rlcarroll@rcn.com (Robert Carroll); Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 19:03:27 -0500; Does anyone have experience with the supposedly fabulous Ten Tec Orion? I have seen no reviews yet. http://www.tentec.com/TT565.htm Bob W2WG I technical Hi Ken, What rigs have your friends used befor; /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00257.html (9,802 bytes)
4. [Amps] ICOM 756 PRO II or FT 1000 MP Field or Mk 5 ? (score: 1): Author: Kenneth D. Grimm, K4XL" <K4XL@arrl.net (Kenneth D. Grimm, K4XL); Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 19:31:25 -0500; It's my understanding that the first rigs haven't shipped yet. 73, Ken K4XL k4xl@arrl.net ** BoatAnchor Manual Archive ** On the web at http://bama.sbc.edu or FTP site info: bama.sbc.edu login: anony; /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00258.html (11,112 bytes)
5. [Amps] ICOM 756 PRO II or FT 1000 MP Field or Mk 5 ? (score: 1): Author: dhb@attbi.com (Dave, AA6YQ); Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 19:42:33 -0500; I have used a MarkV for DXing over the past two years. While I have never failed to make a contact due to the MarkV, I would characterize it as having serious ergonomic limitations: 1. there are seve; /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00259.html (10,128 bytes)
6. [Amps] ICOM 756 PRO II or FT 1000 MP Field or Mk 5 ? (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 15:08:50 -1000; So far as I know, none have as yet been shipped. Alleged to begin after New Years. They have a large backlog of orders; first orders were taken last June. If you order now, delivery will be later ne; /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00261.html (8,237 bytes)
7. [Amps] ICOM 756 PRO II or FT 1000 MP Field or Mk 5 ? (score: 1): Author: n4gi@tampabay.rr.com (Blake Meinecke); Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 21:25:01 -0500; This loaded question pokes it's head everywhere.... Like the rest of life, it's all in what you want to get out of it. Kindof like the candy commercial so eloquently states: "Sometimes I feel like a; /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00262.html (8,544 bytes)
8. [Amps] ICOM 756 PRO II or FT 1000 MP Field or Mk 5 ? (score: 1): Author: w6te@pacbell.net (Dave Smith - W6TE); Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 22:34:11 -0800; Friends, Blake couldn't have said it better. I've never had a rig that could filter adjacent channel interference like the MK-V! I'm talking extremely loud adjacent channel. I'm extremely satisfied w; /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00263.html (9,296 bytes)
9. [Amps] ICOM 756 PRO II or FT 1000 MP Field or Mk 5 ? (score: 1): Author: Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.co.uk (Ian White, G3SEK); Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 09:11:58 +0000; There's a head-to-head user review at: http://www.w8zr.com/markv/index.htm -- 73 from Ian G3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) Editor, 'The VHF/UHF DX Book' http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek; /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00265.html (8,825 bytes)
10. [Amps] ICOM 756 PRO II or FT 1000 MP Field or Mk 5 ? (score: 1): Author: KenK1ZYW@aol.com (KenK1ZYW@aol.com); Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 15:59:07 EST; I WAS AN ICOM MAN TILL I GOT THE FT1000 MP FIELD (I HAD SEVERAL DEAD IN THE BOX MK5'S.... BUT FIELD IS PERFECT) IT IS A NO BRAINER..... GET YAESU IF YOU ARE A SERIOUS CONTESTER OR DXER AND ARE WILLIN; /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00278.html (8,178 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]