Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+LCR\s+meter\.\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] LCR meter. (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <Jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 04:06:27 -0700
dismal results. A 10 uh commercially made roller inductor, wound with 1/4" tubing... measures exactly 10 uh on my B+K 875-B lcr meter. Same deal on my 50 uh roller. When the mfj was used, the same co
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00936.html (10,562 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] LCR meter. (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine AC0C" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 10:23:51 -0500
Jim, My question is to the fundamental accuracy of the MFJ vs. the effects on calibration variation. Is the MFJ really this inaccurate, or is the accuracy in your case atypical. It would be interesti
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00945.html (12,842 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] LCR meter. (score: 1)
Author: Ryan Foster <foster.ryan@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:06:08 -0400
I don't remember the exact results, but my mfj-259 was well off from my cheap chinese lcr meter, and that was always within 2% of a borrowed good B&K. I have never trusted the mfj analyzer to do anyt
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00946.html (15,650 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] LCR meter. (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 11:28:37 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Trying to measure the inductance of coils like we are talking about at a high RF frequency is almost always an exercise in futility because of the parasitic capacitance all s
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00950.html (9,071 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] LCR meter. (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:58:05 -0400
MFJ and accuarcy should not be used in the same sentence. Carl KM1H I don't remember the exact results, but my mfj-259 was well off from my cheap chinese lcr meter, and that was always within 2% of a
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00954.html (15,781 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] LCR meter. (score: 1)
Author: Dave White <mausoptik@btinternet.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 22:23:20 +0200
That's why it's known as 'More F** Junk', right? Dave G0OIL MFJ and accuarcy should not be used in the same sentence. Carl KM1H [truncated by sender] _______________________________________________ A
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00958.html (7,928 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] LCR meter. (score: 1)
Author: "Alex Eban" <alexeban@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 09:32:42 +0300
The AADE instrument is more than adequate for all practical purposes. It's nice to have variable frequency option, but in any case, at the higher frequencies, the influence of unpredictable strays in
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00986.html (15,072 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu