Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Length\s+of\s+coax\s+from\s+xcvr\s+to\s+amp\s+affecting\s+input\s+swr\.\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Length of coax from xcvr to amp affecting input swr. (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 04:40:50 -0800
With short length's of coax, [no more than aprx 3'], the input swr between either my FT-1000-D or my FT-1000-MK-V... and the input to my Drake L4B is dead flat. Once the coax is lengthened to aprx 6'
/archives//html/Amps/2011-12/msg00288.html (7,609 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] Length of coax from xcvr to amp affecting input swr. (score: 1)
Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 16:23:30 -0500
Well, if there is SWR on the line, then it is an impedence transformer and the amount of transformation is determined by line length. SWR is, by definition, the same everywhere along a length of loss
/archives//html/Amps/2012-01/msg00001.html (10,181 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] Length of coax from xcvr to amp affecting input swr. (score: 1)
Author: "Hardy Landskov" <n7rt@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 15:32:22 -0700
Jim, Have you tried a different SWR meter? It could be that the directivity of your meter is poor and as you add coax, the voltage maxima changes position on the coax allowing a small amout of input
/archives//html/Amps/2012-01/msg00002.html (10,534 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] Length of coax from xcvr to amp affecting input swr. (score: 1)
Author: "Tony Brock-Fisher" <barockteer@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 16:48:50 -0500
It seems the same misconception has appeared on two reflectors simultaneously, the TT reflector and this one! That being that adding a length of transmission line somehow affects the SWR on the line.
/archives//html/Amps/2012-01/msg00003.html (9,315 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] Length of coax from xcvr to amp affecting input swr. (score: 1)
Author: Dan Mills <dmills@exponent.myzen.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 22:46:33 +0000
The in band match may well be just fine, but any harmonic energy will be mismatched by the tuned input stage and will be reflected, upsetting the impedance seen by the rigs LPF at that harmonic in a
/archives//html/Amps/2012-01/msg00005.html (8,989 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] Length of coax from xcvr to amp affecting input swr. (score: 1)
Author: Steve <iteration69@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 22:50:37 -0500
The hb amp resides in the Hmm. Next door, does this imply a different power circuit? Possible a ground loop problem? Steve _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@conte
/archives//html/Amps/2012-01/msg00006.html (8,041 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] Length of coax from xcvr to amp affecting input swr. (score: 1)
Author: Charles Harpole <k4vud@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2012 02:04:36 +0000
This is a common phenomena and many amp users see it with a variety of amp makes and models. Alpha recommends 3 feet, and that works great. There must be another magic length longer than 3 feet, but
/archives//html/Amps/2012-01/msg00007.html (10,431 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] Length of coax from xcvr to amp affecting input swr. (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2012 14:27:37 -0500
Hi Jim, What you may be seeing is the short transmission line is not really acting as a transmission line. When a transmission line is short (in wavelength) the load dominates the impedance rather th
/archives//html/Amps/2012-01/msg00009.html (11,333 bytes)

9. Re: [Amps] Length of coax from xcvr to amp affecting input swr. (score: 1)
Author: ToddRoberts2001@aol.com
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2012 12:50:19 -0500 (EST)
Could it be the tuned input circuit in the amp you are driving just does not have enough range to bring it into a perfect match with your driver? The mismatch may be more noticeable the longer the le
/archives//html/Amps/2012-01/msg00014.html (9,027 bytes)

10. Re: [Amps] Length of coax from xcvr to amp affecting input swr. (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2012 13:18:20 -0500
True as long as the characteristic Z of the additional line remains constant. In the literature, this footnote needs to be added to the general statement above. It's been repeated over-and-over agai
/archives//html/Amps/2012-01/msg00019.html (9,942 bytes)

11. Re: [Amps] Length of coax from xcvr to amp affecting input swr. (score: 1)
Author: "R. Morris" <robrk@nidhog.net>
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2012 13:43:55 -0500
Collins wants 20.5 feet of RG58 to their 30L1. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2012-01/msg00021.html (8,903 bytes)

12. Re: [Amps] Length of coax from xcvr to amp affecting input swr. (score: 1)
Author: Glen Zook <gzook@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2012 12:10:28 -0800 (PST)
No! The 30S-1 recommends a length of 20.5 feet but the specification for the 30L-1 was changed to basically any length of cable with 48 inches being the generally accepted length of RG58/U because th
/archives//html/Amps/2012-01/msg00023.html (11,160 bytes)

13. Re: [Amps] Length of coax from xcvr to amp affecting input swr. (score: 1)
Author: Robert Morris <robrk@nidhog.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2012 15:56:51 -0500
YES... or what my 30L1 books says... 5th Edition, 1962. Got a later book or service bulletin that shows the change? No! The 30S-1 recommends a length of 20.5 feet but the specification for the 30L-1
/archives//html/Amps/2012-01/msg00030.html (10,813 bytes)

14. Re: [Amps] Length of coax from xcvr to amp affecting input swr. (score: 1)
Author: Glen Zook <gzook@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2012 14:33:39 -0800 (PST)
There was a later Service Letter, not a true Service Bulletin put out rescinding this requirement. Somewhere, I think I have a copy of the Service Letter.  I will try to find it. I don't know if ther
/archives//html/Amps/2012-01/msg00032.html (10,704 bytes)

15. Re: [Amps] Length of coax from xcvr to amp affecting input swr. (score: 1)
Author: "R. Morris" <robrk@nidhog.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 18:33:49 -0500
Mine is a late RE. Can't get behind the desk, at the moment, to check SN. I've used any length on hand with no issue. Maybe they did something to the tuned input or the manual writer just grabbed the
/archives//html/Amps/2012-01/msg00072.html (9,744 bytes)

16. Re: [Amps] Length of coax from xcvr to amp affecting input swr. (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Giacobello, K2XX" <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 12:29:16 -0500
I ran a 30S1 for years with random lengths of coax between the amp and exciter. It never was a problem. 73, Joe K2XX _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.
/archives//html/Amps/2012-01/msg00095.html (10,636 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu