Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+MFJ\s+and\s+Dahl\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+MFJ\s+and\s+Dahl\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] MFJ and Dahl (score: 1): Author: john <johnmb@nc.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 19:59:47 -0500; "...anyone want to bet the Martin F. Jue will buy it for pennies on the dollar? " If Martin Jue had been running it , it probably would still be a going concern, and quite profitable! John K5MO _____; /archives//html/Amps/2007-12/msg00084.html (6,962 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] MFJ and Dahl (score: 1): Author: Don Kessler <ki6sz@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 20:14:07 -0500; Thankfully Martin Jue was not running it. If he had, it would have earned the shame reputation that MFJ has for producing utter rubbish... MFJ has managed to suck the quality out of every company the; /archives//html/Amps/2007-12/msg00085.html (7,579 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] MFJ and Dahl (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 20:42:07 -0500; Profit and garbage is his business plan. Selling to idiot hams is one thing, selling to industrial customers is something altogether different. Ameritron has steadily gone down hill since More Friggi; /archives//html/Amps/2007-12/msg00086.html (7,671 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] MFJ and Dahl (score: 1): Author: Scott Manthe <n9aa@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2007 20:42:24 -0500; I think pre-MFJ Ameritron amps were not as well built as post-MFJ Ameritron amps. The AL-84 is plastic and uses sweep tubes and the original AL-80 is junk compared to the "A" or "B" models. While it'; /archives//html/Amps/2007-12/msg00087.html (8,378 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] MFJ and Dahl (score: 1): Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 18:15:50 -0800; Yeah, I suspect the big improvements in the Ameritron amps came when W8JI took over the business from Prime Instruments. Its too bad the Jue doesn't pay more attention to quality. There are lot of us; /archives//html/Amps/2007-12/msg00090.html (8,461 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] MFJ and Dahl (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 21:24:25 -0500; The AL-84 was entry level at a time sweep tubes were cheap, import TX tubes werent available yet and domestice were expensive. They were made to compete with almost identical amps from Dentron and Am; /archives//html/Amps/2007-12/msg00093.html (10,358 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] MFJ and Dahl (score: 1): Author: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>; Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2007 21:06:50 -0600; Gentlemen, Bashing MFJ seems to be the delight of some. MFJ makes products that are affordable and makes hundreds of products for hams. I use a number of MFJ products and they work. The quality of so; /archives//html/Amps/2007-12/msg00095.html (8,474 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] MFJ and Dahl (score: 1): Author: "Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>; Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 00:52:02 -0500; Carl, This is the end of this attack on Martin Jue and any discussion on your part concerning him or his products. You do not need to purchase from him or his companies but there is no excuse for vei; /archives//html/Amps/2007-12/msg00098.html (8,234 bytes)
9. Re: [Amps] MFJ and Dahl (score: 1): Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 11:12:21 -0800; N9AA is exactly right. MFJ makes what hams need at prices they can pay. There are often very good reasons that the companies MFJ buys are available for sale. I agree with the observation that the equ; /archives//html/Amps/2007-12/msg00108.html (8,338 bytes)
10. Re: [Amps] MFJ and Dahl (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2007 11:48:27 -0800; I strongly disagree. When a company blankets a market with low cost low quality stuff (as MFJ and Walmart do), it usually pushes other companies with better quality stuff at a somewhat higher prices; /archives//html/Amps/2007-12/msg00109.html (8,259 bytes)
11. Re: [Amps] MFJ and Dahl (score: 1): Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 12:31:41 -0800; I agree, Jim. Dahl is a great example. Dahl had a good following not because he had the lowest prices, but because he had a reputation for building a top-notch product. People buy Dahl because the wa; /archives//html/Amps/2007-12/msg00110.html (11,631 bytes)
12. Re: [Amps] MFJ and Dahl (score: 1): Author: John/K4WJ <k4wj@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2007 16:04:47 -0500; Jim, If not enough hams want to pay a higher price for higher quality goods then the high quality supplier will go out of business, if they can't sell enough product to make a profit. Do want to deny; /archives//html/Amps/2007-12/msg00111.html (9,091 bytes)
13. Re: [Amps] MFJ and Dahl (score: 1): Author: Steve Berg <wa9jml@tbc.net>; Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2007 15:17:06 -0600; I bought a new power transformer years ago from Peter Dahl for my old Gonset GSB-100 exciter. It is far better than the original, which like most of the other OEM transformers was bad when I got the; /archives//html/Amps/2007-12/msg00112.html (8,975 bytes)
14. Re: [Amps] MFJ and Dahl (score: 1): Author: "Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>; Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 17:58:53 -0500; This is the AMPS list - not an MBA case study. The "MFJ and Dahl" tread will end NOW or I will start unsubscribing people. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@conte; /archives//html/Amps/2007-12/msg00115.html (7,736 bytes)
15. Re: [Amps] MFJ and Dahl (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 18:16:21 -0500; What I dont understand is some of the prices charged at Dahl. Take for instance a boatanchor receiver audio output xfmr for a SX-28, NC-183D or similar. Originals were sent so some engineering wasnt; /archives//html/Amps/2007-12/msg00116.html (10,763 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]