Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Massive\s+transformer\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Massive\s+transformer\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Massive transformer (score: 1): Author: Gary Patterson <gpatterson53@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:40:54 -0500; I picked up a large maybe 70-80 pound transformer that has only a 115 primary. I measured secondary voltage at about 5200 v. The secondary resistance is 147 ohms. Am I correct in assuming I wont get; /archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00305.html (8,120 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Massive transformer (score: 1): Author: TexasRF@aol.com; Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:56:42 EST; Hi Gary, your transformer was designed to use a filter choke followed by modest C type filter. With this type filter you should be able to supply several hundred milliamperes of current. You might wa; /archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00306.html (7,760 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Massive transformer (score: 1): Author: n8de@thepoint.net; Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:59:51 -0500; Let's see .... E=IR ... so the voltage loss in the secondary would be E= 147 x current drawn .... say 2 amps = 294volts 5200 - 294 = 4906 volts..... Why do you think you won't get much current out of; /archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00308.html (9,264 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] Massive transformer (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:17:12 -0500; I'll assume for the moment that transformer secondary has a center tap which would make it a 2500VAC transformer in a FWCT rectifier. At that weight it is at least a 500ma CCS rating and likely more.; /archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00309.html (10,025 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] Massive transformer (score: 1): Author: Robert Morris <robrk@nidhog.net>; Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:12:13 -0500; Massive and 80 pounds in the same sentence ?? If you can pick it up, it ain't big enough.... K2RK -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to; /archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00312.html (8,408 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] Massive transformer (score: 1): Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:11:16 -0500; That had crossed my mind. Back in Breckenridge, living in a new home with lots of room and acres on which I could put up antennas I picked up some surplus RF generators. I'm sure I have some photos o; /archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00315.html (11,104 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] Massive transformer (score: 1): Author: "Phil Clements" <philc@texascellnet.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:10:42 -0600; primary. I 147 My guess is 300-350 MA. Phil, K5PC _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps; /archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00322.html (8,911 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] Massive transformer (score: 1): Author: "Paul Kraemer" <elespe@lisco.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:26:09 -0600; I measured a similar UTC S-50 item with a 5kv ct winding rated at 300madc and a single 115vac primary It reads 460 ohms across the total seconday and weighs about 65 lbs Paul K0UYA __________________; /archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00324.html (9,678 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]