Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Maximum\s+RF\s+output\s+in\s+practical\s+application\:\s+4\-250A\s*$/: 69 ]

Total 69 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Maximum RF output in practical application: 4-250A (score: 1)
Author: "W.F van Wyk" <zs6arf@telkomsa.net>
Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 15:15:34 +0200
I have been hearing claims at the local flea markets here in South Africa that a single 4-250A valve is capable of between 800 - 900 watts in ham band amplifier application. Now I have used these mys
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00012.html (7,403 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] Maximum RF output in practical application: 4-250A (score: 1)
Author: R L Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 08:06:48 -0700
W. F. -- With its max peak emission of 1.3a and a 4500v anode supply using g-g config., my guess is that a 4-250A has enough stuff to do 1000w-out PEP in SSB service provided that it is tuned up with
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00025.html (8,867 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] Maximum RF output in practical application: 4-250A (score: 1)
Author: "wc6w@juno.com" <wc6w@juno.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 22:20:32 GMT
Wynand & Rich, In an impractical application, a Kahn envelope elimination and restoration amplifier, the 4-250A is capable of a smidge over 2KW PEP just as in plate modulated AM operation. The max pl
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00030.html (10,041 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] Maximum RF output in practical application: 4-250A (score: 1)
Author: R L Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 17:53:34 -0700
was the plate/anode white hot? R L MEASURES, AG6K. 805-386-3734 r@somis.org _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/l
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00034.html (11,097 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] Maximum RF output in practical application: 4-250A (score: 1)
Author: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 12:02:18 +0200 (CEST)
In Class C, they're rated at 900 watts input. The filament structure is the same as the 3-500, so I'd expect similar performance, just less plate dissipation. For speech without a processor, you'd pr
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00040.html (8,270 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] Maximum RF output in practical application: 4-250A (score: 1)
Author: "W.F van Wyk" <zs6arf@telkomsa.net>
Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 12:40:28 +0200
Thanks Peter. That is what I usually aim at when I construct ... about a kW out but I have gone to considerable trouble and expense acquiring spectrum analyzer/communication analyzer and other test e
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00041.html (9,675 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] Maximum RF output in practical application: 4-250A (score: 1)
Author: "wc6w@juno.com" <wc6w@juno.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 13:42:13 GMT
<snip> Hi Rich, Not if the tube is operated at 90% efficiency. You may want to review Kahn's Envelope Restoration technique in the Proceedings of the IRE, Vol. 40, July 1952, pp 803-806 Some further
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00045.html (9,011 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] Maximum RF output in practical application: 4-250A (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 07:03:04 -0700
There is an intersting article in QEX this month where the author describes a 2KW PEP 80/40 meter output amplifier using 4 TV sweeps tubes with a switchmode power supply providing envelope restoratio
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00048.html (9,324 bytes)

9. Re: [Amps] Maximum RF output in practical application: 4-250A (score: 1)
Author: Vic K2VCO <vic@rakefet.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2006 08:03:19 -0700
This is great! I can finally achieve my goal of getting 1 KW CW from my favorite tube, the 813. It does complicate bandswitching, though. -- 73, Vic, K2VCO Fresno CA http://www.qsl.net/k2vco ________
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00052.html (8,448 bytes)

10. Re: [Amps] Maximum RF output in practical application: 4-250A (score: 1)
Author: "Bill L. Fuqua" <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>
Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2006 12:08:07 -0400
Reading the emails I have not seen one that states the obvious. The 4-250A is electrically identical to the 4-400A except for plate dissipation. They just added fins to the 4-250A to make the 4-400A.
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00057.html (9,866 bytes)

11. Re: [Amps] Maximum RF output in practical application: 4-250A (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Tonne" <tonne@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 14:14:36 -0400
That RCA rig was a single-frequency affair and that circuit is a bitch to tune. I wouldn't touch it for ham use unless I wanted to park it on, say, 3885 kHz. Been there. - Jim WB6BLD ________________
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00062.html (8,882 bytes)

12. Re: [Amps] Maximum RF output in practical application: 4-250A (score: 1)
Author: R L Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 07:27:50 -0700
And if the 4-250A is operated at 110% efficiency in high humidity, frost will form on the envelope during lengthy transmissions? Seriously, Marv, after looking at the constant-current curves, I don't
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00069.html (10,445 bytes)

13. Re: [Amps] Maximum RF output in practical application: 4-250A (score: 1)
Author: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 10:06:29 +0200 (CEST)
Wynand - and this applies generally, I think - more than 400W so the last think we need is the regulator having to enforce the regulations< We need to bear in mind the spurious emission requirements
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00074.html (11,750 bytes)

14. Re: [Amps] Maximum RF output in practical application: 4-250A (score: 1)
Author: <sm0aom@telia.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 10:49:47 +0200 (MEST)
Most interesting discussion. Peter wrote: "On the other hand, if in a 10kHz wide band starting 6.75 kHz away, you aren't down 50dB, then you're somewhat antisocial anyway." It appears, from i.a. SM5B
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00078.html (14,227 bytes)

15. Re: [Amps] Maximum RF output in practical application: 4-250A (score: 1)
Author: <sm0aom@telia.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 10:50:37 +0200 (MEST)
Most interesting discussion. Peter wrote: "On the other hand, if in a 10kHz wide band starting 6.75 kHz away, you aren't down 50dB, then you're somewhat antisocial anyway." It appears, from i.a. SM5B
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00079.html (13,856 bytes)

16. Re: [Amps] Maximum RF output in practical application: 4-250A (score: 1)
Author: zdtech <zdtech@iprimus.com.au>
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 20:26:58 +1000
I think based on the work by SM5BSZ i think a good standard to aim for in ham transmitters would be the FCC's Part 80 maritime IMD mask standard. It requires 3rd order products to be down 30 db as re
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00081.html (16,248 bytes)

17. Re: [Amps] Maximum RF output in practical application: 4-250A (score: 1)
Author: Steve Thompson <g8gsq@eltac.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 11:42:49 +0100
At VHF the ETSI specs. I've been working to lately have changed from the old MPT ones and there's an absolute -36dBm on harmonics and spurious up to 1GHz, regardless of tx power level. At 100W it's a
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00083.html (9,220 bytes)

18. Re: [Amps] Maximum RF output in practical application: 4-250A (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 08:32:03 -0400
I think based on the work by SM5BSZ i think a good standard to aim for in ham transmitters would be the FCC's Part 80 maritime IMD mask standard. It requires 3rd order products to be down 30 db as re
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00091.html (9,688 bytes)

19. Re: [Amps] Maximum RF output in practical application: 4-250A (score: 1)
Author: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 15:37:19 +0200 (CEST)
bandwidth limit. If you are below such a signal level at 3kHz on SSB, you can be doing anything you want in that 3kHz.< You need a bit more of a spectral mask than just a bandwidth limit to ensure th
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00093.html (9,126 bytes)

20. Re: [Amps] Maximum RF output in practical application: 4-250A (score: 1)
Author: R L Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 05:49:26 -0700
With a 3kHz limit, AM would be virtually banned. Should AM have 2x the limit of SSB? R L MEASURES, AG6K. 805-386-3734 r@somis.org _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amp
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00098.html (9,634 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu