Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+NEC\-think\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+NEC\-think\.\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [Amps] NEC-think. (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 17:01:25 -0800; In a 240v circuit, Neutral carries zero current and Ground carries zero current. How could the thermal cycles differ? Richard L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734. www.somis.org __________________________; /archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00231.html (10,066 bytes)
22. Re: [Amps] NEC-think. (score: 1): Author: John <crazytvjohn@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 17:22:32 -0800 (PST); John <crazytvjohn@yahoo.com> wrote: Not true. If both sides are perfectly balanced then no current flows into the neutral. If not balanced current will flow down the neutral. john In a 240v circuit,; /archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00232.html (8,216 bytes)
23. Re: [Amps] NEC-think. (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 17:50:44 -0800; You added something that was not present in he model. Richard L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734. www.somis.org _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http; /archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00233.html (8,606 bytes)
24. Re: [Amps] NEC-think. (score: 1): Author: John Popelish <jpopelish@rica.net>; Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 21:48:12 -0500; Oh, you are talking about unnecessary neutrals. Okay, you win. ;-) _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/a; /archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00234.html (9,875 bytes)
25. Re: [Amps] NEC-think. (score: 1): Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>; Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2006 16:43:40 +0000; I believe the correct spelling is "gnaw".... _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps; /archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00246.html (8,505 bytes)
26. Re: [Amps] NEC-think. (score: 1): Author: "m.ford" <k1ern@direcway.com>; Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2006 13:05:57 -0500; Yeah, I gnow. Mike k1ern _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps; /archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00247.html (9,137 bytes)
27. Re: [Amps] NEC-think. (score: 1): Author: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>; Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 19:34:39 +0100 (CET); I wish these damn keyboards would learn to spell instead of relying on us humans! 73 Peter G3RZP _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.co; /archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00248.html (7,800 bytes)
28. Re: [Amps] NEC-think. (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>; Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2006 16:59:31 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Right you are. I don't know how many keyboards I've tryed (there it goes again) and still kan't fing a goood wun. Bill, W6WRT _____; /archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00249.html (7,833 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 28
Page: [1] [2]