Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+NOS\s+8874\s+$3cx400$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+NOS\s+8874\s+$3cx400$\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] NOS 8874 (3cx400) (score: 1): Author: <gd0tep@manx.net>; Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2022 04:22:55 -0500; Hi to the group, I have been offered a pair of new old stock 8874 tubes. These would be very nice to have for a rebuild project, BUT with date codes in the 1980's, what would be the normal practice t; /archives//html/Amps/2022-01/msg00013.html (6,525 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] NOS 8874 (3cx400) (score: 1): Author: gudguyham--- via Amps <amps@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2022 11:06:37 +0000 (UTC); Those tubes getter with just filament voltage so to degas them run them with normal filament voltage and cooling. Those tubes are very unlikely to get gassy but anything is possible so why not be sa; /archives//html/Amps/2022-01/msg00014.html (8,195 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]