Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+New\s+FET\'s\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+New\s+FET\'s\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] New FET's (score: 1): Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@ezwv.com>; Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 19:34:44 -0500; Got an e-mail earlier today about International Rectifier having a new FET that would replace the 2N2907 and 2N2222. Quote; "The IRHLUB7970Z4 and IRHLUB770Z4 require less energy, switch faster and fe; /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00360.html (7,551 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] New FET's (score: 1): Author: David Kirkby <david.kirkby@onetel.net>; Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:52:45 +0000; Will Matney wrote: Got an e-mail earlier today about International Rectifier having a new FET that would replace the 2N2907 and 2N2222. Quote; "The IRHLUB7970Z4 and IRHLUB770Z4 require less energy, s; /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00362.html (7,554 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] New FET's (score: 1): Author: "Iezzi Family" <slifamily@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 20:46:47 -0500; These are Radiation Tolerant parts for spaceflight and the $80 price tag is a bargain for what you get. Steve KT4FY Got an e-mail earlier today about International Rectifier having a new FET that wou; /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00368.html (8,136 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] New FET's (score: 1): Author: Japerlick@aol.com; Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 21:14:02 EST; No, no....those are radiation-hardened MOSFETs for Military use. What you want to use is the wonderful 2N7000 (or the SMT version 2N7002). A wonderful part...no resistors needed to interface directly; /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00372.html (6,911 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] New FET's (score: 1): Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@ezwv.com>; Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 21:59:53 -0500; Well of course, the e-mail was from the Defense Electronics newsletter. I had an alterior motive showing another $3,000 toilet seat, etc.. But, evidently, they have been using mil. grade 2N2222's and; /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00375.html (8,270 bytes)
6. RE: [Amps] New FET's (score: 1): Author: "Rich" <rdjmgmt@socket.net>; Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 22:29:52 -0600; I just had to jump in on this, where I worked we did a lot of testing of parts for the military. When they request that each bolt to hold a tail on a airplane be machined to an extra close tolerance; /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00377.html (8,053 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] New FET's (score: 1): Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@ezwv.com>; Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 23:38:30 -0500; LOL, I wonder if they x-ray the toilet seat for a crack, or the other way around, x-ray the crack which will set on the seat? Also, I wonder if they tested each seat for comfort? You know, we wouldn'; /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00378.html (9,207 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] New FET's (score: 1): Author: "S. J. Blackwell" <w5lu@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 23:48:14 -0600; Will, If you were upside down at 45,000 ft doing Mach 1.2 in an F-16 getting ready to split-S with a SAM on your tail or in a vacuum in outer space, would you rather have a $0.29 cent 2N2222 in your; /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00380.html (8,227 bytes)
9. Re: [Amps] New FET's (score: 1): Author: "Bill Turner" <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 22:31:09 -0800; 1000 times the price happens, but it's not necessarily the fault of the manufacturer. If Uncle Sam wants toilet seats designed and tested to mil specs with full documentation, it's going to cost him.; /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00382.html (8,579 bytes)
10. Re: [Amps] New FET's (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 03:11:40 -0800; On Feb 9, 2005, at 8:29 PM, Rich wrote: I just had to jump in on this, where I worked we did a lot of testing of parts for the military. When they request that each bolt to hold a tail on a airplane; /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00389.html (9,489 bytes)
11. Re: [Amps] New FET's (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 03:08:41 -0800; On Feb 9, 2005, at 6:59 PM, Will Matney wrote: Well of course, the e-mail was from the Defense Electronics newsletter. I had an alterior motive showing another $3,000 toilet seat, etc.. 3-kilobuck cr; /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00390.html (8,318 bytes)
12. Re: [Amps] New FET's (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 03:15:25 -0800; On Feb 9, 2005, at 9:48 PM, S. J. Blackwell wrote: Will, If you were upside down at 45,000 ft doing Mach 1.2 in an F-16 getting ready to split-S with a SAM on your tail or in a vacuum in outer space,; /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00391.html (9,489 bytes)
13. Re: [Amps] New FET's (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 07:29:36 -0500; A dozen or more years ago, I was involved in a project to fly a space science instrument on a Soviet spacecraft (my part in the project was diplomatic, not technical). It used a solid-state memory un; /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00394.html (10,219 bytes)
14. Re: [Amps] New FET's (score: 1): Author: G3rzp@aol.com; Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:38:37 EST; Semiconductors to MIL Spec for space use are MIL 883 level S. They are made in the same way on the same production line as the common or garden commercial variety (in most firms, anyway), but just ge; /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00397.html (8,714 bytes)
15. Re: [Amps] New FET's (score: 1): Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 07:22:21 -0800; And to think that I was getting chewed out about discussing non-technical topics like non-linear amplifier gain, plasma heating, and ionospheric propagation. I am glad to see we have brought things b; /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00404.html (8,456 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]