Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+New\s+SB\-200\s+owner\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+New\s+SB\-200\s+owner\s*$/: 43 ]

Total 43 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [Amps] New SB-200 owner (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 19:58:37 -0400; Carl, I'm not bashing the Super Cathode circuit or Orr, just the misapplication of what WAS a great circuit in one particular application. I also don't like a bad idea being forced down people's thro; /archives//html/Amps/2007-09/msg00435.html (12,600 bytes)
42. Re: [Amps] New SB-200 owner (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 20:16:39 -0400; <SNIP> . This is much more prevalent in amateur radio I wish they did that back in the early 50's issues. I built a 6AG7-6L6 TX and could barely make a QSO a 1/2 mile away on 80M. Then I got a QSL fr; /archives//html/Amps/2007-09/msg00437.html (9,842 bytes)
43. [Amps] New SB-200 owner (score: 1): Author: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>; Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 08:24:48 +0200 (CEST); I would describe the business with the super cathode circuit and triodes as being one where the animal changed from having feathers to having fur, and then found it couldn't fly! The original was fro; /archives//html/Amps/2007-09/msg00449.html (8,482 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 43
Page: [1] [2] [3]