Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Now\s+RCA\s+$was\s+DIN$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Now\s+RCA\s+$was\s+DIN$\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Amps] Now RCA (was DIN) (score: 1): Author: "Mike Sawyer" <w3slk@uplink.net>; Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 19:06:11 -0500; I tend to disagree with you on that one, with the exception being consumer electronics. I own a RCA SSB-1K amplifier that is built like a battleship. A pair of 3-400Z's @ 2800VDC will do a kilowatt a; /archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00569.html (9,324 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Now RCA (was DIN) (score: 1): Author: "Bert Almemo" <balmemo@sympatico.ca>; Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 19:23:24 -0500; Hi Mike, When I wrote bang on in my comment to Gary, I meant the RCA connectors! Nothing else. 73 Bert, SM7BUR I tend to disagree with you on that one, with the exception being consumer electronics.; /archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00570.html (9,796 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Now RCA (was DIN) (score: 1): Author: "Gary Smith" <wa6fgi@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 17:27:23 -0800; I do concur they did build some good stuff, although they (read D. Sarnoff) were slow to embrace FM. I was referring to (and should have made clear) those two comments had to do with their two-way fm; /archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00571.html (10,857 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]