Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Oscilloscopes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Oscilloscopes\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Oscilloscopes (score: 1): Author: "David C. Hallam" <dhallam@rapidsys.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 13:58:42 -0500; What is the difference between a TEK 454 and a 454A? David KC2JD _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amp; /archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00248.html (6,853 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Oscilloscopes (score: 1): Author: "wc6w@juno.com" <wc6w@juno.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 19:24:35 GMT; Hi David, From fuzzy memory, I believe that the 454 had about 6 nuvistors includ= ing a few in the first vertical amp and the "A" was all transistor. 73 & Good morning, Marv WC6W David KC2JD ________; /archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00250.html (6,982 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Oscilloscopes (score: 1): Author: "Edgar Brown, N6OU" <yungthor@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 15:34:17 -0800; Hi Marv, your memory is pretty good. The 454 does have 6 nuvistors (including the 2 aged ones) I had to glance at the manual Hi David, From fuzzy memory, I believe that the 454 had about 6 nuvistors; /archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00260.html (7,205 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] Oscilloscopes (score: 1): Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 00:27:57 -0500; I have a 453 here that worls like a champ to this day. Setup the same with 6 nuvistors. Those were some pretty darn tough old scopes if they had been taken decent care of. The only fault I really had; /archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00261.html (8,865 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] Oscilloscopes (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 21:56:43 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The nuvistor was an amazing tube too. RCA used them in TV tuners for years and I only recall ever having to replace one. Quite impr; /archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00262.html (7,271 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] Oscilloscopes (score: 1): Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 01:22:03 -0500; Bill, Same here. I repaired a few tube sets in the tail end of them around 1980 while a few was still left, and know the sets your talking about. I never did change one out of a TV, nor even test one; /archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00263.html (9,583 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] Oscilloscopes (score: 1): Author: "David C. Hallam" <dhallam@rapidsys.com>; Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 15:56:54 -0500; Thanks to all who responded to my question about the TEK 454 and 454A oscilloscopes. David KC2JD _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.con; /archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00270.html (7,278 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]