Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+PL\-259\s+and\s+SO\-239\s+cable\s+attachments\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+PL\-259\s+and\s+SO\-239\s+cable\s+attachments\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] PL-259 and SO-239 cable attachments (score: 1): Author: Gene May <gene-may@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 16:55:44 -0400; This is a semi-new thread, branching off the discussion related to cable connections that started on "Tubes vs. Solid State" then went on to "Soldering vs. Crimping": I hope it isn't too stupid a que; /archives//html/Amps/2012-05/msg00086.html (8,083 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] PL-259 and SO-239 cable attachments (score: 1): Author: "Steve Katz" <stevek@jmr.com>; Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 14:05:52 -0700; I know that SO239s do not have their metal connection "buried" as deeply inside as female 115 VAC power sockets do, so don't furnish as much protection from contact with a "hot" lead. Still, how and/; /archives//html/Amps/2012-05/msg00087.html (8,728 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] PL-259 and SO-239 cable attachments (score: 1): Author: W4ABW@aol.com; Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 17:05:05 -0400 (EDT); Another question if I may that's very easy but not to me yet. If I use a larger coax 'tween my exciter and my amp will that give a lil more output ? I am using the smaller coax now that Alpha supplie; /archives//html/Amps/2012-05/msg00089.html (7,654 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] PL-259 and SO-239 cable attachments (score: 1): Author: "Steve Katz" <stevek@jmr.com>; Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 14:15:26 -0700; Another question if I may that's very easy but not to me yet. If I use a larger coax 'tween my exciter and my amp will that give a lil more output ? I am using the smaller coax now that Alpha supplie; /archives//html/Amps/2012-05/msg00090.html (8,223 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] PL-259 and SO-239 cable attachments (score: 1): Author: Glen Zook <gzook@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 14:14:27 -0700 (PDT); How many 01 tubes does your amplifier use! 89 years ago! :>) As for more output: Theoretically, using a larger diameter cable should reduce the losses in the cable which, in turn, should produce m; /archives//html/Amps/2012-05/msg00091.html (8,971 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] PL-259 and SO-239 cable attachments (score: 1): Author: "Steve Katz" <stevek@jmr.com>; Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 14:22:15 -0700; As for more output: Theoretically, using a larger diameter cable should reduce the losses in the cable which, in turn, should produce more output. Now that output difference is going to be, at best; /archives//html/Amps/2012-05/msg00092.html (8,019 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] PL-259 and SO-239 cable attachments (score: 1): Author: "Alex Eban" <alexeban@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 09:27:12 +0300; A valid point! It seems to me that, originally, RF cabling was almost universally in the hands of knowledgeable people, technicians and amateurs. They would have been much more aware of the possible; /archives//html/Amps/2012-05/msg00103.html (10,382 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]