Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Possible\s+issue\s+with\s+B\-\s+run\s+in\s+wire\s+with\s+less\s+than\s+HV\s+rating\?\s+$Separate\s+HV\s+PSU\s+and\s+RF\s+decks$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Possible\s+issue\s+with\s+B\-\s+run\s+in\s+wire\s+with\s+less\s+than\s+HV\s+rating\?\s+$Separate\s+HV\s+PSU\s+and\s+RF\s+decks$\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Possible issue with B- run in wire with less than HV rating? (Separate HV PSU and RF decks) (score: 1): Author: Marius Hauki <rezycle.bin@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:45:31 +0200; Hi. I have been following the interesting safety discussion. Let us consider this scenario: we have a separate amp and HV deck. The anode has a potential of 3650 volts on it. The cap bank in the HV d; /archives//html/Amps/2010-09/msg00164.html (8,242 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Possible issue with B- run in wire with less than HV rating? (Separate HV PSU and RF decks) (score: 1): Author: Carl Clawson <carlclawson@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:28:40 -0700; Hi Marius, Your scenario can happen. I recently saw B- arcing to the chassis through the insulation on low voltage wiring in an LK500-ZB amplifier. It had suffered an HV arc during which the grid met; /archives//html/Amps/2010-09/msg00171.html (11,141 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Possible issue with B- run in wire with less than HV rating? (Separate HV PSU and RF decks) (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:35:15 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: <snip> REPLY: You should not be using a chassis to B- resistor. Use a pair of heavy duty diodes instead, reverse connected. When the B+ to chassis arc occurs they will place what is; /archives//html/Amps/2010-09/msg00172.html (8,019 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]