Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Power\/VSWR\s+readings\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Power\/VSWR\s+readings\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Power/VSWR readings (score: 1): Author: g8gsq@qsl.net (Steve Thompson); Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 08:54:10 +0100; snip I find it helps to consider this as two separate issues: What the readings tell you - two things, the degree of mismatch at the output of the meter (relative to the meter Zo) and the amount of p; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00107.html (8,104 bytes)
2. [Amps] Power/VSWR readings (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 07:27:11 -0500; Sometimes 20dB or so is close enough to perfect. 20dB is 1%. That is not a significant error when the meter itself is 5% or so of full scale anywhere on the scale. Read the measurements I posted, or; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00108.html (7,104 bytes)
3. [Amps] Power/VSWR readings (score: 1): Author: g8gsq@qsl.net (Steve Thompson); Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 14:12:52 +0000; 1% power, but 10% voltage or current. Agreed - and I thought your measurements demonstrated the reality very well. To give an example of what I was meaning to convey, consider measuring a VSWR which; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00112.html (7,897 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]